Title Companies, Affinity Fraud, Human Decency, and the Pursuit of Everything Else at All Costs
Recently, an investigative reporter for Seattle, Washington’s King 5 News broke a story that illustrates a concept and a phrase that may be unfamiliar to many, Affinity Fraud. Affinity Fraud refers to a situation where a trusted member of a shared group or organization preys upon a victim. In the recently reported story, reporter Susannah Frame found that a mortgage broker affiliated with a Filipino Christian congregation devised a fraudulent scheme to procure home loans for church members with damaged credit. The mortgage broker deceived homebuyers and lenders by substituting the identities and credit histories of past customers who were also church members. These unsuspecting and misdirected individuals thought they were purchasing homes when, in fact, ownership was vested in the names of others. It should come as no surprise that forged documents can be traced to a single title company and a number of its employees who are notaries. The mortgage broker took the scheme to new depths by collecting monthly payments from borrowers and allowing the loans to default.
Susannah Frame was correct to question the practices of the title company identified in her report; notary abuse is just one visible symptom of a greater disregard for accepted practices. Real estate fraud requires a great deal of planning and coordination among numerous insiders; it takes a team. The fraudster has no choice but to enlist the cooperation of a title agent who is uniquely positioned as the “last line of defense” in any transaction. The transparency of this particular scheme and the brazenness of the fraudsters should shock everyone. Clearly, they felt they would not be caught, or that nothing would happen to them if they did. Boy, were they were sorely misinformed! The number of real estate-related crimes reported each year has become a primary focus of federal investigators and prosecutors. State and local authorities are equally as concerned and only slightly less so prepared to take a serious stance (budgets permitting). Still, a title community comprised of properly trained professionals should have proven a formidable barrier to the criminal aspirations of the mortgage broker described in the King 5 News report. So, what exactly is the problem?
The title industry faces an enormously complex set of challenges as it evolves from something that it was in the past to something that it’s expected to be in the present. I often ask audiences of title agents to define their work product in 10 words or less. The answer is not quite as simple as it seems. The traditional sources of business for the title industry now have an affinity of their own for sharing profits in return for directed title orders. The title industry once possessed a moral high ground that has eroded in the face of anti-competitive forces. Today’s title agent lacks the ability to confront partners in joint ventures or to replace lost sources of business. Is the title company in the King 5 News report guilty of greed in a traditional sense, or is it guilty of a newly spawned category of real estate fraud, “complacency on demand?” Only a thorough investigation by authorities will reveal the real motive… both are criminal offenses.
It is my opinion that the land title industry exists for the following reasons:
1. To expertly examine titles and provide curative remedies for title issues
2. To disclose all material facts (in writing) to interested parties
3. To actively promote fraud prevention in real estate transactions
Many title agents lack the professional skills needed to fulfill the legal duty to act in the best interest of consumers and lenders. Licensing standards are determined by individual states, as are continuing education requirements. For the most part, it requires very little experience or practical knowledge to become a title agent. Continuing education is geared towards the novice and has little to offer seasoned practitioners. Additionally, title insurers are far too zealous in their efforts to expand market share by signing new agencies. The overall effect has been disastrous for the public as evidenced by current fraud statistics and the endless barrage of news reports illuminating the activities of fraudsters.
Back to King 5 News reporter Susannah Frame…she has a blog that adds valuable insight into the human side of Seattle’s real estate-related affinity fraud. Honest and well-intended members of Seattle’s real estate community are properly concerned that the reputation of their industry has been tarnished by the unscrupulous behavior of one single mortgage broker and a single title company. Members of Christian groups worry as well that the public will be unforgiving in its assessment of their religious beliefs. The actions of real estate professionals profoundly influence the lives of many.
At the end of the day, after contemplating the motives of a title company that lacks the courage to say “no” and the actions of a dishonest woman hiding behind a veil of religious values, one question remains: What has happened to human decency?
Filed under: Affinity Fraud,Ed Rybczynski,Real Estate Fraud,Title Insurance,Washington



Ralph, excellent comments on Frame’s report. Your opinions and insight are invaluable to the real estate finance industry as a whole.
I especially appreciate your observation of “complacency on demand.” While we can all see evidence of fraud in the title industry, it makes sense that one of the reasons these agents may be turning the other way is to comply with the expectations of the principals and affiliates of a title agency’s structure.
And, while lacking back bone, regardless of the reason, is not a quality exclusive to the title industry, it is imperative that this issue be brought into focus since, as you point out, they are a last line of defense.
I too speak to and provide continuing education to dozens of title companies and agencies each year. I am hearing a general feeling of frustration when it comes to the issue of how to handle requests to turning the other way; even if that request is implied.
The title industry faces challenges that other professions in the real estate finance industry must face as well. That is the ever-present and ongoing battle between quality control and sales.
Keeping out the riff-raff should be a primary concern, but it IS possible to “quality control” yourself right out of business. That said, I think we’d all prefer erring on the side of quality control.
For example, appraisers are under the same type of pressure. If they can’t do what is expected of them i.e. hit the “required value,” they are considered “difficult” and will not get any repeat business. While this does not fall squarely under the category of affinity fraud, I believe it helps point out that – pressures to do the wrong thing are extremely strong in this industry and cannot be dealt with by preaching, “Just Say No.”
Addressing the psychological aspect of this pressure and providing agents and closers with useful tools and procedures to deal with it is, in my opinion, the best way to turn this thing around.
Jerome Mayne
President, Fraudcon, Inc.
http://www.fraudcon.com
612-919-3007
Comment by Jerome Mayne — December 8, 2006 @ 11:28 am
There is a massive mortgage fraud on-going in Southern California. Will cause over $1 Billion in damages. I personally lost over $500,000. The perpetrators are James B. Duncan, Hendrix Montecastro, Anthony Contreras, Maurice McLeod, Steve Kayden, Helen Montecastro, Charlie Choi, Paul Sluss, Rodd Leonard, Jogn Ranic, Bridgett Holbrook, and Chris Oetting. They operate under many shell companies, Stonewood Consulting, Pacific Wealth Management a NV LLC, Inland Coast Capital, The Henson Group, Success Strategies, Coast Wealth Management, Total Return Fund, Jovane Investments, Cathedral Capital Partners, Palm Valley Advisors, and many many others.
Beware of them. They have damaged well over 1000 victims and still counting.
See our victim website to understand their schemes
http://www.coreclient.110mb.com/
Comment by Foolish One — May 23, 2007 @ 12:20 pm
they took my home and land when i had proof of payment.. also had lawyer and he must have been in on it, he came up sospended and we lost everything
Comment by margie winkles — February 14, 2009 @ 12:44 am