Search


About

Flipping Frenzy.com is your source for news, information, and commentary on Real Estate and Mortgage Fraud. Click here to learn more.


Suspect Fraud?

If you believe you have been a victim of real estate or mortgage fraud, start here! Select your state from the pulldown menu below:

Articles

Our founder, Ralph Roberts, has written many eye-opening articles about Real Estate and Mortgage Fraud. Click here for more information.

Contact Ralph

If you would like to talk with us about a Real Estate or Mortgage Fraud-related matter, please click here.


Click Above for Info

Categories

Ralph's Latest Book: Click Above for Info

May 2012
S M T W T F S
« Jun    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Click Above for Info

Recent comments

The FBI Investigates Mortgage Fraud!

Recent posts

Archives

May 28, 2011

Mortgage Fraud Defendant Sentenced to Prison

TAMPA, FL—U.S. Attorney Robert E. O’Neill announces that U.S. District Judge Susan C. Bucklew today sentenced Sang Min Kim, a/k/a Sonny Kim (37, Tampa) to 41 months in federal prison for conspiracy to commit wire, mail, and bank fraud and money laundering in connection with a mortgage fraud scheme. As part of his sentence, the court entered a money judgment in the amount of $5,826,778.65, the proceeds of the charged criminal conduct.

Kim pleaded guilty on June 29, 2010. According to court documents, from about January 2005 through October 2008, Kim engaged in numerous residential real estate transactions in the Middle District of Florida, primarily in Hillsborough County, at least 48 of which involved fraud and resulted in losses of approximately $5,826,778.65.

Kim purchased residential properties as an “investor” with the intention of “flipping” the properties in subsequent sales. Kim’s co-conspirators identified the properties he purchased, usually at market value, by accepting quit claim deeds from the sellers. Frequently, Kim’s co-conspirators also identified the “buyers” to whom he flipped the properties. Kim’s buyers’ mortgage loan applications typically included the false claim that they intended to occupy the properties they were purchasing, when in fact they never intended to purchase Kim’s properties as places to live. Moreover, Kim’s buyers made no genuine financial commitment of funds to their purchase transactions. The buyers’ stated down payments were fictitious because the funds used to make the down payments were either provided by Kim or another, or the buyer used his or her own money and was subsequently reimbursed by Kim who used loan proceeds to do so. The “buyers” were motivated to participate in these transactions by the fact that they were being paid to assume the role of “purchaser.”

As a part of the fraud scheme, Kim used appraisers whom he knew would “come in higher” on appraised values. He also regularly provided a title agent with additional compensation in the form of “side commissions” in exchange for expediting closings. Kim was aware that at least one mortgage broker created false W-2 forms to document a prospective borrower’s stated income. Kim was also aware that his company, SK Investment Group, LLC, was used to provide false employment verifications for other fraudulent transactions from which he did not directly benefit. Kim was also aware that one or more mortgage brokers, through whom he conducted his purchase/sales transactions, made up fictitious income and false assets that were inserted on prospective buyers’ loan applications. Kim was assisted in his fraudulent purchase/sales transactions by persons employed by federally insured financial institutions. Those persons were aware that Kim, as the seller, received a portion of funds derived from equity lines of credit acquired by his buyers.

This case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation. It was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Rachelle DesVaux Bedke.

May 4, 2011

Mortgage Loan Officer Sentenced for Role in Fraud Scheme

NEWARK, NJ—A former New Jersey loan officer was sentenced today to 70 months in prison in connection with a mortgage fraud and property-flipping scheme involving rental properties in Paterson, NJ ., United States Attorney Paul J Fishman announced. Amer Mir, 42, of Jersey City, NJ ., was previously convicted in December 2009 after a five-week jury trial of wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud before United States District Judge Jose L Linares. Judge Linares also imposed the sentence today in Newark federal court. According to documents filed in this case and statements made in court: While a loan officer at Jersey City-based United Home Mortgage Co ., Mir conspired to originate fraudulent mortgage loans that were used to finance and refinance the purchase of two- and three-family rental properties in Paterson, NJ. by borrowers who could not afford those loans.

During late 2003 through early 2005, Mir routinely overstated borrowers’ assets when taking their loan applications. In addition, he directed the creation of false letters concerning the borrowers’ credit histories. He received $200,000 in commissions once the fraudulent loans closed, as well as substantial cash payments from one of the ringleaders of the scheme.

And Judge Linares found that Mir lied to law enforcement prior to being charged and then perjured himself repeatedly while testifying at trial. In addition to the prison term, Mir was sentenced to three years of supervised release, ordered to pay $2,341,937.82 in restitution, and required to forfeit $210,000 in proceeds of the scheme. Mir’s case is part of an ongoing investigation by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Inspector General (HUD-OIG), the FBI, the United States Postal Inspection Service and IRS-Criminal Investigation into fraudulent Federal Housing Administration-insured and conventional mortgage loans originated by various New Jersey mortgage companies.

The investigation has resulted in more than a dozen convictions of current or former New Jersey residents, including: Michael Eliasof, a former real estate agent who helped orchestrate the scheme; Gerald Carti, a former loan officer and shareholder of United States Mortgage Corp. who originated fraudulent mortgage loans during the scheme; Frederick Ugwu, a real estate investor who sold many Paterson properties during the scheme; Norman Barna, who like Ugwu sold many Paterson properties through the scheme; William Ottaviano, an appraiser who misstated the condition of many of the Paterson properties involved in the scheme; Renford Davis and Hopeton Bradley (now deceased), who jointly managed many of the Paterson properties involved in the scheme; Claribel Morrobel, a recruiter for the scheme; and Melanie Gebbia, the former legal assistant of William Colacino (now deceased), a former Garfield attorney and municipal court judge. Ugwu was convicted at the 2009 trial for his role in the scheme, and Judge Linares recently sentenced him to 50 months in prison and ordered him to pay more than $1.6 million in restitution and forfeit more than $1.75 million in proceeds from the scheme.

In addition, Judge Linares recently sentenced Corallo, Eliasof, Carti and Ottaviano to 51 months, 40 months, 27 months, 15 months, and six months in prison, respectively, for their roles in the scheme, while Barna, Gebbia, and Morrobel each received probation. United States Attorney Fishman credited special agents of HUD-OIG, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Joseph W Clarke for the Mid-Atlantic region; special agents of the FBI, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Michael B Ward in Newark; inspectors of the United States Postal Inspection Service, under the direction of Acting Postal Inspector In Charge Thomas E Boyle; and special agents of IRS-Criminal Investigation, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Victor W Lessoff, for the investigation leading to today’s sentence.

The government is represented by Assistant United States Attorney Mark E Coyne, Chief of the United States Attorney’s Appeals Division, and Assistant United States Attorney Matthew E Beck of the United States Attorney’s Economic Crimes Unit. Defense counsel: Gerald M Saluti, Esq ., Newark, NJ.

Reported by: FBI

March 24, 2011

New Jersey Real Estate Investor Sentenced to 50 Months in Prison for Role in Mortgage Fraud, Property-Flipping Scheme

NEWARK, NJ—A New Jersey real estate investor was sentenced today to 50 months in prison in connection with a mortgage fraud and property-flipping scheme involving rental properties in Paterson, N.J., U.S. Attorney Paul J. Fishman announced.

Frederick Ugwu, 54, of Upper Saddle River, N.J., was convicted in December 2009 after a five-week jury trial on counts of wire fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy to commit those offenses before U.S. District Judge Jose L. Linares. Judge Linares also imposed the sentence today in Newark federal court.

According to documents filed in this case and statements made in court:

Ugwu conspired with several others to sell two- and three-family rental properties to borrowers whose mortgage loans were obtained by fraud. Ugwu acquired distressed rental properties in Paterson cheaply, made basic or minimal repairs to them, and then sold them for several times more than he paid for them just weeks or months earlier. When selling these properties, he signed documents before and at the closings falsely representing that the borrowers had paid him tens of thousands in down payments and at the closings. In fact, the borrowers made no such payments. Ugwu also allowed hundreds of thousands of dollars in proceeds from some of the sales to go to his coconspirators while hiding many of those payments from the mortgage lenders.

In addition to the prison term, Judge Linares sentenced Ugwu to three years of supervised release and ordered him to pay $1,602,958.62 in restitution. Ugwu is also required to forfeit $1,753,212.06 in proceeds of the scheme, plus the contents of three different bank accounts that he used to deposit those proceeds.

Ugwu’s case is part of an ongoing investigation by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Inspector General (HUD-OIG), the FBI, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and IRS-Criminal Investigation into fraudulent Federal Housing Administration-insured and conventional mortgage loans originated by various New Jersey mortgage companies. The investigation has resulted in more than a dozen guilty pleas from current or former New Jersey residents, including:

* Michael Eliasof, a former Paramus, N.J., real estate agent;
* Gerald Carti, a former loan officer and shareholder of U.S. Mortgage Corp.;
* Amer Mir, a former loan officer of United Home Mortgage Co.;
* Norman Barna, who, like Ugwu, sold numerous Paterson properties through the scheme;
* William Ottaviano, an appraiser;
* Renford Davis and Hopeton Bradley (now deceased), who jointly managed many of the Paterson properties involved in the scheme;
* Claribel Morrobel, a recruiter for the scheme; and
* Melanie Gebbia, the former legal assistant of William Colacino (now deceased), a former Garfield attorney and municipal court judge.

Mir was convicted at the 2009 trial for his role in the mortgage fraud scheme; his sentencing is scheduled for April 20, 2011. In addition, Judge Linares recently sentenced Corallo, Eliasof, Carti, and Ottaviano to 51 months, 40 months, 27 months, 15 months, and six months in prison, respectively, for their roles in the scheme, while Barna, Gebbia, and Morrobel each received probation.

U.S. Attorney Fishman credited special agents of HUD-OIG, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Joseph W. Clarke for the Mid-Atlantic region; special agents of the FBI, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Michael B. Ward in Newark; inspectors of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, under the direction of Acting Postal Inspector In Charge Thomas E. Boyle; and special agents of IRS-Criminal Investigation, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Victor W. Lessoff, for the investigation leading to today’s sentence.

The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark E. Coyne, Chief of the U.S. Attorney’s Office Appeals Division, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew E. Beck of the U.S. Attorney’s Office Economic Crimes Unit in Newark.

Defense counsel: Henry E. Klingeman, Esq., Newark, N.J.

March 7, 2011

Two More Plead Guilty in Ongoing Treasure Valley Mortgage Fraud Case

Melody C. Redondo, 32, and Paul G. Redondo, 33, both of Meridian, Idaho, entered guilty pleas today in U.S. District Court in Boise, U.S. Attorney Wendy J. Olson announced. Melody Redondo pleaded guilty to making a false statement to a financial institution, a felony. Paul Redondo pleaded guilty to misdemeanor theft from a financial institution.

Melody Redondo admitted that in July 2007, she submitted a false application to obtain financing from Washington Mutual Bank on a $200,000 loan. Redondo represented on the loan application that she had monthly gross income of $13,000; however, her total income in 2007 was substantially less. Redondo submitted the loan application to Washington Mutual Bank to obtain a home equity line of credit. The bank relied upon the loan application, which contained the defendant’s materially false statement, and authorized funding of the loan. The charge of making a false statement to a financial institution is punishable by a term of imprisonment of 30 years, a term of supervised release of up to five years, and a maximum fine of $1 million.

Paul Redondo admitted that in August 2007, he submitted a consumer loan application to obtain financing on a $100,000 home equity line of credit on a home in Eagle, Idaho. He also admitted to falsely represented his monthly gross income on the loan application that was submitted to Washington Trust Bank. Misdemeanor theft from a financial institution carries a maximum punishment of one year in prison, a $100,000 fine, and a term of supervised release of not more than one year.

Sentencing for Melody Redondo is scheduled for May 3, 2011, before Chief U.S. District Judge B. Lynn Winmill in Boise. Sentencing for Paul Redondo is scheduled for May 4, 2011, before U.S. Magistrate Judge Ronald E. Bush.

The case is part of the ongoing Crestwood mortgage fraud case, which involved multiple defendants who bought and sold real estate in order to “flip” it, or gain profits from the sales. The financial institutions and mortgage lenders incurred losses of approximately $1.6 million dollars.

To date, eight other people have been sentenced or pleaded guilty in the case: Michael J. Hymas, formerly of Boise, was sentenced to 21 months in federal prison for wire fraud and ordered to pay $544,647 in restitution; Shauntee K. Ferguson, of Boise, was sentenced to probation for five years, 80 hours of community service, and ordered to pay $365,829.69 in restitution for making a false statement to a financial institution; Christopher R. Georgeson, formerly of Boise, currently of Phoenix, Arizona, was sentenced to one month in federal prison for wire fraud and ordered to pay $103,356.64 in restitution; Stanley J. Ferguson, of Boise, was sentenced to 12 months plus one day in federal prison and ordered to pay $676,826 in restitution; and Brent Bethers, of Eagle, Idaho, was sentenced to one month in federal prison for wire fraud, ordered to pay $23,913 in restitution, and fined $6,000.

Travis Hymas, formerly of the Boise area, currently of Cedar Hills, Utah, pleaded guilty to false statement to a bank in March 2010. Shane Hymas and Laurie Krechelle Hymas, both formerly of the Boise area, currently of American Fork, Utah, pleaded guilty to bank fraud in April 2010. Sentencings for all three have been rescheduled to April 11, 2011, in Boise before U.S. District Judge Edward J. Lodge. Each faces a maximum sentence of 30 years in federal prison, a fine of up to $1 million, and supervised release of up to five years.

“Homeowners, the economy and financial institutions all suffer from fraudulent housing transactions,” said Olson. “The Crestwood mortgage fraud cases demonstrate federal and state law enforcement agencies’ commitment to aggressively investigate and prosecute fraud in the housing finance industry.”

The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and was prosecuted by the United States Attorney’s Office and the State of Idaho Office of the Attorney General.

Posted By: Ralph Roberts @ 12:53 pm | | Comments (0) | Trackback |
Filed under: Bank Fraud,Flipping Scam,Loan Fraud,Mortgage Fraud,Wire Fraud

February 28, 2011

Mortgage Fraud Violator Sentenced to 65 Months in Prison

R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and Jonathan I. Solomon, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, announced that defendant Jose G. Martin was sentenced today by U.S. District Court Judge Marcia Cooke to sixty five months in federal prison, to be followed by three years of supervised release. Judge Cooke also ordered a restitution hearing to determine the identity of the victims to be paid by Martin in connection with the $3,198,278 in restitution for losses that resulted from Martin’s participation in a mortgage fraud scheme.

Defendant Jose G. Martin was arrested in January 2009 for facilitating the fraudulent sale of seven residential properties through straw buyers. The scheme resulted in more than $6.6 million in fraudulent loans. Defendant Martin personally received more than $1 million in gross proceeds from this scheme. The defendant pled guilty on April 1, 2009, to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1349, and one count of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1343.

To effectuate the scheme, at the closings, defendant Martin submitted fraudulent invoices for construction work on these residential properties, and received hundreds of thousands of dollars as payment for construction work that was never performed. Defendant Martin then used these proceeds to pay the straw buyers and other co-conspirators, and kept a portion of the money for himself. After the closings, defendant Martin and the straw buyers failed to make payments on the mortgages to the victim lenders, and the properties went into foreclosure.

In one example of this scheme, defendant Martin repeatedly flipped a property on Alesio Avenue in Coral Gables, FL. The Coral Gables property was flipped three times within approximately two years, more than doubling the price of the property from $550,000 to $1,200,000. In the course of these flips of the Coral Gables property, Martin diverted to himself approximately $450,000 for construction work purportedly performed on this property. In addition, Martin paid off three straw buyers of this property, none of whom ever intended to live in the property or make payments on the mortgages. Ultimately, the Coral Gables property went into foreclosure, resulting in significant losses to the lender.

This case was investigated by agencies participating in the Federal-State Mortgage Fraud Strike Force. Mr. Acosta commends the investigative efforts of the Mortgage Fraud Strike Force, with particular commendation to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The case was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Peter A. Forand.

A copy of this press release may be found on the website of the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida at http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/fls. Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at http://www.flsd.uscourts.gov or on http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

Posted By: Ralph Roberts @ 1:45 am | | Comments (0) | Trackback |
Filed under: Flipping Scam,Mortgage Fraud,Mortgage Fraud Scheme,Wire Fraud

February 20, 2011

Cottage Grove Man Pleads Guilty to Defrauding Investors in a House-Flipping Scheme

Earlier today in federal court in Minneapolis, a 46-year-old Cottage Grove man pleaded guilty to defrauding investors out of more than $5 million in a multi-state house-flipping scheme. Appearing before United States District Court Chief Judge Michael J. Davis, Robert W. Dufresne pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud and one count of money laundering in relation to his crime. He was charged on February 7, 2011.

In his plea agreement, Dufresne admitted that between October of 2005 and October of 2008, he sought investors to supply funds purportedly for the purchase, rebuilding, and resale of residential properties in Minnesota and other states. Investors expected the sale proceeds to be divided among them. However, Dufresne used the initial investment funds for his personal benefit and relied on subsequent investment funds to pay off the initial investors.

For his crimes, Dufresne faces a potential maximum penalty of 20 years in federal prison on the mail fraud charge and 10 years for money laundering. Judge Davis will determine his sentence at a future hearing, yet to be scheduled.

This case is the result of an investigation by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation Division. It is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert M. Lewis.

Posted By: Ralph Roberts @ 11:17 am | | Comments (0) | Trackback |
Filed under: Flipping,Flipping Scam,House-Flipping Scheme

January 17, 2011

Disbarred Attorney Convicted in Mortgage Fraud Scheme

ROBERT ERNEST BRANDT, 42, a former Kirkland attorney and escrow officer, was convicted in U.S. District Court in Seattle yesterday of conspiracy and four counts of wire fraud. The jury deliberated approximately one day following an eight-day trial. When sentenced by U.S. District Judge Richard A. Jones on June 25, 2010, BRANDT faces up to 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
The federal case was indicted in June of 2008, as part of Operation Malicious Mortgage, and the overall investigation was conducted jointly with the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions, the King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, and the Kirkland Police Department.
According to records in the case and testimony at trial, over a dozen people, including BRANDT, were linked to an extensive mortgage fraud scheme operating in 2004 and 2005. Those who have already pleaded guilty in the scheme include a former bank employee, mortgage brokers, as well as the owner of shell companies involved in “flipping” dozens of properties as part of the fraud.
Ten members of the scheme were charged, six in federal and four in state court. All of the charged defendants pleaded guilty except for BRANDT. A number of the charged co-conspirators testified at trial. These included William Anderson, 49, of Bellevue, who worked at the same escrow company as BRANDT and operated some of the shell companies involved in the purchases. Anderson admitted conspiring with BRANDT and Mustafa “Marc” Khosraw, 48, a real estate agent and mortgage broker; Kristyn Jupiter Moss, 40, a branch manager for Viking Bank; Zachary Joseph Namie, 32, a loan officer with a mortgage company; and Patrick Williams, (prosecuted in state court) who recruited straw buyers, found properties, and provided false employment verifications to the lenders.
The conspirators would identify houses and would use shell companies or third parties to purchase the homes. At the same time they recruited “straw buyers” who would enter into a purchase agreement to buy the same home from the conspirators at an inflated price (a “flip”). The conspirators assisted the straw buyers with phony paperwork for the home loans, making it appear that they were qualified for the mortgage loans and planned to occupy the houses. Members of the conspiracy allegedly falsified numerous documents including appraisals, verifications of deposits, employment verification and closing documents. In fact, the conspirators simply split the proceeds from the fraudulent mortgages, and the straw buyers defaulted on the loans after pocketing as much as $20,000 for their fee. The homes were foreclosed and financial institutions and mortgage lenders suffered substantial losses, estimated to exceed $7 million dollars.
For his part, BRANDT ran a company called “Escrow Authority,” that closed all of the sales of the flipped properties. He permitted other members of the scheme to use money out of his lawyer’s trust account to acquire properties. The same properties were then quickly resold to straw buyers for significantly higher prices, and fraudulent loans were obtained to finance the fictitious resales. BRANDT also helped create shell companies used as part of the scheme, and signed off on fraudulent settlement statements (HUD forms) provided to lenders that failed to disclose the fraudulent nature of the transactions. BRANDT was disbarred in 2006, after the Washington State Bar Association concluded he had allowed the improper use of his client trust account in the mortgage fraud scheme, and had improperly engaged in transactions in which he had a conflict of interest.
In asking the jury to find BRANDT guilty, Assistant United States Attorney Vince Lombardi urged jurors to do two things: “follow the money;” and evaluate the lies BRANDT told under oath to try to cover up his role in the scheme.
The case was investigated by the FBI, the King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions (DFI), and the Kirkland Police Department.
The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Vincent T. Lombardi and Nicholas W. Brown.
For additional information please contact Emily Langlie, Public Affairs Officer for the United States Attorney’s Office, at (206) 553-4110. For more information on Operation Malicious Mortgage, please review the Department of Justice Website at http://www.usdoj.gov.

January 16, 2011

‘Malicious’ Mortgage Fraud More Than 400 Charged Nationwide

Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip and FBI Director Robert Mueller announced the results of “Operation Malicious Mortgage,” a massive multiagency takedown of mortgage fraud schemes involving more than 400 defendants nationwide who have been charged over the past three and a half months.
The operation focused primarily on three types of mortgage fraud—lending fraud, foreclosure rescue schemes, and mortgage-related bankruptcy schemes. “To persons who are involved in such schemes, we will find you, you will be investigated, and you will be prosecuted,” said Mueller. “To those who would contemplate misleading, engaging in such schemes, you will spend time in jail.”
Among the 400-plus subjects of Operation Malicious Mortgage, there have been 173 convictions and 81 sentencings so far for crimes that have accounted for more than $1 billion in estimated losses. Forty-six of our 56 field offices around the country took part in the operation, which has secured more than $60 million in assets.
During its investigative phase, we worked closely with our partner agencies—including the Postal Inspection Service, Internal Revenue Service, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Secret Service, U.S. Trustee Program, and the Inspector General Offices of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Department of Veterans Affairs, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
The FBI’s mortgage fraud caseload has doubled in the past three years to more than 1,400 pending cases. To address this steady growth, Mueller noted that every FBI field office focuses on this criminal priority. The Bureau also takes part in 42 mortgage fraud task forces and working groups. And we continue our joint efforts with federal, state, and local agencies.
“Our objective, as always,” said Mueller, ”is to protect the consumer and stabilize our economic markets.”
Among the Bureau’s mortgage fraud cases are 19 sub-prime-related corporate fraud investigations. Most of these corporate fraud investigations, said Mueller, deal with accounting fraud, with insider trading, and with criminal intent, the failure to disclose the proper valuations of the securitized loans and derivatives.
Deputy Attorney General Filip also said that the Justice Departments remains committed to investigating and prosecuting cases of mortgage-related securities fraud, noting today’s announcement of an indictment against two senior managers of failed Bear Stearns hedge funds.

November 9, 2010

Former Springfield Resident Pleads Guilty to Mortgage Fraud

BOSTON—United States Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz; William P. Offord, Special Agent in Charge of the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigations, Boston Field Division; and Richard DesLauries, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Boston Field Division, announced today that EDGAR CORONA pleaded guilty before U.S. District Judge Michael A. Ponsor to wire fraud and money laundering.
At today’s plea hearing, the prosecutor told the court that had the case proceeded to trial, the government’s evidence would have proven that from 1998 through 2002, Corona, 32, participated in a multi-million-dollar mortgage fraud scheme involving the sale of distressed properties at inflated prices. Corona served as a “runner,” who recruited prospective buyers for the land flippers. Twelve other individuals were previously convicted in the same scheme.
Judge Ponsor sentenced the defendant today to time served and three years of supervised release and advised the defendant that it was likely that he would be deported.
The case was investigated by the Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. It was being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Karen Goodwin of Ortiz’s Springfield Branch Office.
Mortgage fraud is a key focus of the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice alongside its federal, state, and local partners is committed to investigating and prosecuting significant financial crimes. The Department is committed to combating discrimination and fraud in the lending and financial markets, and recovering proceeds for victims of financial crimes.

Posted By: Ralph Roberts @ 9:35 am | | Comments (0) | Trackback |
Filed under: Flipping,Flipping Scam,Money Laundering,Mortgage Fraud,Mortgage Fraud Scheme

October 15, 2010

Leader of Property-Flipping Scheme and Husband Sentenced in Family Scheme to Conceal Millions in Profits From the Purchase and Sale of Foreclosed Properties

Concealed from IRS Millions of Dollars of Profits Made from “Flipping” Hundreds of Properties Bought at Foreclosure Auctions

GREENBELT, MD—Chief U.S. District Judge Deborah K. Chasanow sentenced Minh-Vu Hoang, age 58, of Bethesda, Maryland, today to five years in prison followed by three years of supervised release for conspiracy to defraud the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Bankruptcy Trustee in connection with a scheme to conceal millions in profits earned from the purchase and sale of hundreds of foreclosure properties. Judge Chasanow also sentenced her husband Thanh Hoang, age 65, also of Bethesda, to a year and a day in prison followed by two years of supervised release for conspiracy to impede the IRS in connection with his role in the scheme.
The sentences were announced by United States Attorney for the District of Maryland Rod J. Rosenstein; Special Agent in Charge Rebecca Sparkman of the Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation; Montgomery County State’s Attorney John McCarthy; and Special Agent in Charge Richard McFeely of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
“This was a transparent scheme to defraud the United States,” stated Rebecca Sparkman, Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation Special Agent in Charge, Washington, D.C. Field Office. “The IRS-Criminal Investigation is proud to be part of the law enforcement team that is having an impact on this criminal activity.”
According to their plea agreements, the Hoangs and other family members purchased property at foreclosure auctions beginning in 1999, and resold some of the properties at a profit. The Hoangs and others deposited and withdrew money from an escrow account for the purchase and sale of properties, and transferred money from the escrow account to business entities they controlled in order to conceal their financial interests in the properties. From 2000 to 2005, the Hoangs and others purchased and sold hundreds of foreclosure properties using the names of their agents or business entities to conceal their involvement in the purchase and sale of the properties, and thereby avoid taxes.
On May 10, 2005, Minh-Vu Hoang filed for bankruptcy in Maryland. She filed several false schedules and a false statement of financial affairs with the bankruptcy court in support of her bankruptcy petition in which she: reported a financial interest in only six properties, knowing that she had an interest in other properties; substantially under-reported the income she earned in 2003 and 2004; and failed to report her interest in various bank accounts.
The court determined today that the tax loss from the fraud was between $2.5 and $7 million. Because the bankruptcy proceedings are ongoing, the court made no separate determination of the bankruptcy loss.
United States Attorney Rod J. Rosenstein thanked the IRS – Criminal Investigation; Special Investigator Daniel N. Wortman of the Montgomery County State’s Attorney’s Office; the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Greenbelt Office of the United States Trustee Program, the Department of Justice agency that supervises bankruptcy cases and trustees, for their work in this investigation and prosecution. Mr. Rosenstein commended Assistant United States Attorneys David I. Salem and Emily N. Glatfelter, who prosecuted the case.

Posted By: Ralph Roberts @ 12:04 am | | Comments (0) | Trackback |
Filed under: Flipping Scam,Foreclosure,Tax Evasion

October 13, 2010

FBI investigates and tips to help prevent you from being victimized

Redemption / Strawman / Bond Fraud

Proponents of this scheme claim that the U.S. government or the Treasury Department control bank accounts—often referred to as “U.S. Treasury Direct Accounts”—for all U.S. citizens that can be accessed by submitting paperwork with state and federal authorities. Individuals promoting this scam frequently cite various discredited legal theories and may refer to the scheme as “Redemption,” “Strawman,” or “Acceptance for Value.” Trainers and websites will often charge large fees for “kits” that teach individuals how to perpetrate this scheme. They will often imply that others have had great success in discharging debt and purchasing merchandise such as cars and homes. Failures to implement the scheme successfully are attributed to individuals not following instructions in a specific order or not filing paperwork at correct times.

This scheme predominately uses fraudulent financial documents that appear to be legitimate. These documents are frequently referred to as “bills of exchange,” “promissory bonds,” “indemnity bonds,” “offset bonds,” “sight drafts,” or “comptrollers warrants.” In addition, other official documents are used outside of their intended purpose, like IRS forms 1099, 1099-OID, and 8300. This scheme frequently intermingles legal and pseudo legal terminology in order to appear lawful. Notaries may be used in an attempt to make the fraud appear legitimate. Often, victims of the scheme are instructed to address their paperwork to the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury.

Tips for Avoiding Redemption/Strawman/Bond Fraud:

* Be wary of individuals or groups selling kits that they claim will inform you on to access secret bank accounts.
* Be wary of individuals or groups proclaiming that paying federal and/or state income tax is not necessary.
* Do not believe that the U.S. Treasury controls bank accounts for all citizens.
* Be skeptical of individuals advocating that speeding tickets, summons, bills, tax notifications, or similar documents can be resolved by writing “acceptance for value” on them.
* If you know of anyone advocating the use of property liens to coerce acceptance of this scheme, contact your local FBI office.

Advance Fee Schemes

An advance fee scheme occurs when the victim pays money to someone in anticipation of receiving something of greater value—such as a loan, contract, investment, or gift—and then receives little or nothing in return.

The variety of advance fee schemes is limited only by the imagination of the con artists who offer them. They may involve the sale of products or services, the offering of investments, lottery winnings, “found money,” or many other “opportunities.” Clever con artists will offer to find financing arrangements for their clients who pay a “finder’s fee” in advance. They require their clients to sign contracts in which they agree to pay the fee when they are introduced to the financing source. Victims often learn that they are ineligible for financing only after they have paid the “finder” according to the contract. Such agreements may be legal unless it can be shown that the “finder” never had the intention or the ability to provide financing for the victims.

Tips for Avoiding Advanced Fee Schemes:

If the offer of an “opportunity” appears too good to be true, it probably is. Follow common business practice. For example, legitimate business is rarely conducted in cash on a street corner.

* Know who you are dealing with. If you have not heard of a person or company that you intend to do business with, learn more about them. Depending on the amount of money that you plan on spending, you may want to visit the business location, check with the Better Business Bureau, or consult with your bank, an attorney, or the police.
* Make sure you fully understand any business agreement that you enter into. If the terms are complex, have them reviewed by a competent attorney.
* Be wary of businesses that operate out of post office boxes or mail drops and do not have a street address. Also be suspicious when dealing with persons who do not have a direct telephone line and who are never in when you call, but always return your call later.
* Be wary of business deals that require you to sign nondisclosure or non-circumvention agreements that are designed to prevent you from independently verifying the bona fides of the people with whom you intend to do business. Con artists often use non-circumvention agreements to threaten their victims with civil suit if they report their losses to law enforcement.

For more information:
- Work-at-Home Advance Fee Scheme
- Cancer Research Advance Fee Scheme

Identity Theft

Identity theft occurs when someone assumes your identity to perform a fraud or other criminal act. Criminals can get the information they need to assume your identity from a variety of sources, including by stealing your wallet, rifling through your trash, or by compromising your credit or bank information. They may approach you in person, by telephone, or on the Internet and ask you for the information.

The sources of information about you are so numerous that you cannot prevent the theft of your identity. But you can minimize your risk of loss by following a few simple hints.

Tips for Avoiding Identity Theft:

* Never throw away ATM receipts, credit statements, credit cards, or bank statements in a usable form.
* Never give your credit card number over the telephone unless you make the call.
* Reconcile your bank account monthly, and notify your bank of discrepancies immediately.
* Keep a list of telephone numbers to call to report the loss or theft of your wallet, credit cards, etc.
* Report unauthorized financial transactions to your bank, credit card company, and the police as soon as you detect them.
* Review a copy of your credit report at least once each year. Notify the credit bureau in writing of any questionable entries and follow through until they are explained or removed.
* If your identity has been assumed, ask the credit bureau to print a statement to that effect in your credit report.
* If you know of anyone who receives mail from credit card companies or banks in the names of others, report it to local or federal law enforcement authorities.

Investment-Related Scams

Letter of Credit Fraud

Legitimate letters of credit are never sold or offered as investments. They are issued by banks to ensure payment for goods shipped in connection with international trade. Payment on a letter of credit generally requires that the paying bank receive documentation certifying that the goods ordered have been shipped and are en route to their intended destination. Letters of credit frauds are often attempted against banks by providing false documentation to show that goods were shipped when, in fact, no goods or inferior goods were shipped.

Other letter of credit frauds occur when con artists offer a “letter of credit” or “bank guarantee” as an investment wherein the investor is promised huge interest rates on the order of 100 to 300 percent annually. Such investment “opportunities” simply do not exist. (See Prime Bank Notes for additional information.)

Tips for Avoiding Letter of Credit Fraud:

* If an “opportunity” appears too good to be true, it probably is.
* Do not invest in anything unless you understand the deal. Con artists rely on complex transactions and faulty logic to “explain” fraudulent investment schemes.
* Do not invest or attempt to “purchase” a “letter of credit.” Such investments simply do not exist.
* Be wary of any investment that offers the promise of extremely high yields.
* Independently verify the terms of any investment that you intend to make, including the parties involved and the nature of the investment.

Prime Bank Note Fraud

International fraud artists have invented an investment scheme that supposedly offers extremely high yields in a relatively short period of time. In this scheme, they claim to have access to “bank guarantees” that they can buy at a discount and sell at a premium. By reselling the “bank guarantees” several times, they claim to be able to produce exceptional returns on investment. For example, if $10 million worth of “bank guarantees” can be sold at a two percent profit on 10 separate occasions—or “traunches”—the seller would receive a 20 percent profit. Such a scheme is often referred to as a “roll program.”

To make their schemes more enticing, con artists often refer to the “guarantees” as being issued by the world’s “prime banks,” hence the term “prime bank guarantees.” Other official sounding terms are also used, such as “prime bank notes” and “prime bank debentures.” Legal documents associated with such schemes often require the victim to enter into non-disclosure and non-circumvention agreements, offer returns on investment in “a year and a day”, and claim to use forms required by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). In fact, the ICC has issued a warning to all potential investors that no such investments exist.

The purpose of these frauds is generally to encourage the victim to send money to a foreign bank, where it is eventually transferred to an off-shore account in the control of the con artist. From there, the victim’s money is used for the perpetrator’s personal expenses or is laundered in an effort to make it disappear.

While foreign banks use instruments called “bank guarantees” in the same manner that U.S. banks use letters of credit to insure payment for goods in international trade, such bank guarantees are never traded or sold on any kind of market.

Tips for Avoiding Prime Bank Note Fraud:

* Think before you invest in anything. Be wary of an investment in any scheme, referred to as a “roll program,” that offers unusually high yields by buying and selling anything issued by “prime banks.”
* As with any investment, perform due diligence. Independently verify the identity of the people involved, the veracity of the deal, and the existence of the security in which you plan to invest.
* Be wary of business deals that require non-disclosure or non-circumvention agreements that are designed to prevent you from independently verifying information about the investment.

“Ponzi’ Schemes

“Ponzi” schemes promise high financial returns or dividends not available through traditional investments. Instead of investing the funds of victims, however, the con artist pays “dividends” to initial investors using the funds of subsequent investors. The scheme generally falls apart when the operator flees with all of the proceeds or when a sufficient number of new investors cannot be found to allow the continued payment of “dividends.”

This type of fraud is named after its creator—Charles Ponzi of Boston, Massachusetts. In the early 1900s, Ponzi launched a scheme that guaranteed investors a 50 percent return on their investment in postal coupons. Although he was able to pay his initial backers, the scheme dissolved when he was unable to pay later investors.

Tips for Avoiding Ponzi Schemes:

* Be careful of any investment opportunity that makes exaggerated earnings claims.
* Exercise due diligence in selecting investments and the people with whom you invest—in other words, do your homework.
* Consult an unbiased third party—like an unconnected broker or licensed financial advisor—before investing.

For more information:
- Bernie Madoff Case
- Stanford Case
- Wholesale Grocery Distribution Ponzi Scheme
- ATM Ponzi Scheme
- Victims Turn Tables with Ponzi Scheme

Pyramid Schemes

As in Ponzi schemes, the money collected from newer victims of the fraud is paid to earlier victims to provide a veneer of legitimacy. In pyramid schemes, however, the victims themselves are induced to recruit further victims through the payment of recruitment commissions.

More specifically, pyramid schemes—also referred to as franchise fraud or chain referral schemes—are marketing and investment frauds in which an individual is offered a distributorship or franchise to market a particular product. The real profit is earned, not by the sale of the product, but by the sale of new distributorships. Emphasis on selling franchises rather than the product eventually leads to a point where the supply of potential investors is exhausted and the pyramid collapses. At the heart of each pyramid scheme is typically a representation that new participants can recoup their original investments by inducing two or more prospects to make the same investment. Promoters fail to tell prospective participants that this is mathematically impossible for everyone to do, since some participants drop out, while others recoup their original investments and then drop out.

Tips for Avoiding Pyramid Schemes:

* Be wary of “opportunities” to invest your money in franchises or investments that require you to bring in subsequent investors to increase your profit or recoup your initial investment.
* Independently verify the legitimacy of any franchise or investment before you invest.

Market Manipulation or “Pump and Dump” Fraud

This scheme—commonly referred to as a “pump and dump”—creates artificial buying pressure for a targeted security, generally a low-trading volume issuer in the over-the-counter securities market largely controlled by the fraud perpetrators. This artificially increased trading volume has the effect of artificially increasing the price of the targeted security (i.e., the “pump”), which is rapidly sold off into the inflated market for the security by the fraud perpetrators (i.e., the “dump”); resulting in illicit gains to the perpetrators and losses to innocent third party investors. Typically, the increased trading volume is generated by inducing unwitting investors to purchase shares of the targeted security through false or deceptive sales practices and/or public information releases.

A modern variation on this scheme involves largely foreign-based computer criminals gaining unauthorized access to the online brokerage accounts of unsuspecting victims in the United States. These victim accounts are then utilized to engage in coordinated online purchases of the targeted security to affect the pump portion of a manipulation, while the fraud perpetrators sell their pre-existing holdings in the targeted security into the inflated market to complete the dump.

Tips for Avoiding Market Manipulation Fraud:

* Don’t believe the hype.
* Find out where the stock trades.
* Independently verify claims.
* Research the opportunity.
* Beware of high-pressure pitches.
* Always be skeptical.

For more information:
- Operation Shore Shells investigation

Telemarketing Fraud

When you send money to people you do not know personally or give personal or financial information to unknown callers, you increase your chances of becoming a victim of telemarketing fraud.

Here are some warning signs of telemarketing fraud—what a caller may tell you:

* “You must act ‘now’ or the offer won’t be good.”
* “You’ve won a ‘free’ gift, vacation, or prize.” But you have to pay for “postage and handling” or other charges.
* “You must send money, give a credit card or bank account number, or have a check picked up by courier.” You may hear this before you have had a chance to consider the offer carefully.
* “You don’t need to check out the company with anyone.” The callers say you do not need to speak to anyone including your family, lawyer, accountant, local Better Business Bureau, or consumer protection agency.
* “You don’t need any written information about their company or their references.”
* “You can’t afford to miss this ‘high-profit, no-risk’ offer.”

If you hear these or similar “lines” from a telephone salesperson, just say “no thank you” and hang up the telephone.

Tips for Avoiding Telemarketing Fraud:

It’s very difficult to get your money back if you’ve been cheated over the telephone. Before you buy anything by telephone, remember:

* Don’t buy from an unfamiliar company. Legitimate businesses understand that you want more information about their company and are happy to comply.
* Always ask for and wait until you receive written material about any offer or charity. If you get brochures about costly investments, ask someone whose financial advice you trust to review them. But, unfortunately, beware—not everything written down is true.
* Always check out unfamiliar companies with your local consumer protection agency, Better Business Bureau, state attorney general, the National Fraud Information Center, or other watchdog groups. Unfortunately, not all bad businesses can be identified through these organizations.
* Obtain a salesperson’s name, business identity, telephone number, street address, mailing address, and business license number before you transact business. Some con artists give out false names, telephone numbers, addresses, and business license numbers. Verify the accuracy of these items.
* Before you give money to a charity or make an investment, find out what percentage of the money is paid in commissions and what percentage actually goes to the charity or investment.
* Before you send money, ask yourself a simple question. “What guarantee do I really have that this solicitor will use my money in the manner we agreed upon?”
* Don’t pay in advance for services. Pay services only after they are delivered.
* Be wary of companies that want to send a messenger to your home to pick up money, claiming it is part of their service to you. In reality, they are taking your money without leaving any trace of who they are or where they can be reached.
* Always take your time making a decision. Legitimate companies won’t pressure you to make a snap decision.
* Don’t pay for a “free prize.” If a caller tells you the payment is for taxes, he or she is violating federal law.
* Before you receive your next sales pitch, decide what your limits are—the kinds of financial information you will and won’t give out on the telephone.
* Be sure to talk over big investments offered by telephone salespeople with a trusted friend, family member, or financial advisor. It’s never rude to wait and think about an offer.
* Never respond to an offer you don’t understand thoroughly.
* Never send money or give out personal information such as credit card numbers and expiration dates, bank account numbers, dates of birth, or social security numbers to unfamiliar companies or unknown persons.
* Be aware that your personal information is often brokered to telemarketers through third parties.
* If you have been victimized once, be wary of persons who call offering to help you recover your losses for a fee paid in advance.
* If you have information about a fraud, report it to state, local, or federal law enforcement agencies.

For More information:
- Telemarketing Fraud Targeting Seniors

Nigerian Letter or “419” Fraud

Nigerian letter frauds combine the threat of impersonation fraud with a variation of an advance fee scheme in which a letter mailed from Nigeria offers the recipient the “opportunity” to share in a percentage of millions of dollars that the author—a self-proclaimed government official—is trying to transfer illegally out of Nigeria. The recipient is encouraged to send information to the author, such as blank letterhead stationery, bank name and account numbers, and other identifying information using a fax number provided in the letter. Some of these letters have also been received via e-mail through the Internet. The scheme relies on convincing a willing victim, who has demonstrated a “propensity for larceny” by responding to the invitation, to send money to the author of the letter in Nigeria in several installments of increasing amounts for a variety of reasons.

Payment of taxes, bribes to government officials, and legal fees are often described in great detail with the promise that all expenses will be reimbursed as soon as the funds are spirited out of Nigeria. In actuality, the millions of dollars do not exist, and the victim eventually ends up with nothing but loss. Once the victim stops sending money, the perpetrators have been known to use the personal information and checks that they received to impersonate the victim, draining bank accounts and credit card balances. While such an invitation impresses most law-abiding citizens as a laughable hoax, millions of dollars in losses are caused by these schemes annually. Some victims have been lured to Nigeria, where they have been imprisoned against their will along with losing large sums of money. The Nigerian government is not sympathetic to victims of these schemes, since the victim actually conspires to remove funds from Nigeria in a manner that is contrary to Nigerian law. The schemes themselves violate section 419 of the Nigerian criminal code, hence the label “419 fraud.”

Tips for Avoiding Nigerian Letter or “419″ Fraud:

* If you receive a letter from Nigeria asking you to send personal or banking information, do not reply in any manner. Send the letter to the U.S. Secret Service, your local FBI office, or the U.S. Postal Inspection Service. You can also register a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission’s Complaint Assistant.
* If you know someone who is corresponding in one of these schemes, encourage that person to contact the FBI or the U.S. Secret Service as soon as possible.
* Be skeptical of individuals representing themselves as Nigerian or foreign government officials asking for your help in placing large sums of money in overseas bank accounts.
* Do not believe the promise of large sums of money for your cooperation.
* Guard your account information carefully.

For More information:
- Related Online Rental Ads Scheme
- Related Spanish Lottery Scam

Health Care Fraud or Health Insurance Fraud

Medical Equipment Fraud:

Equipment manufacturers offer “free” products to individuals. Insurers are then charged for products that were not needed and/or may not have been delivered.

“Rolling Lab” Schemes:

Unnecessary and sometimes fake tests are given to individuals at health clubs, retirement homes, or shopping malls and billed to insurance companies or Medicare.

Services Not Performed:

Customers or providers bill insurers for services never rendered by changing bills or submitting fake ones.

Medicare Fraud:

Medicare fraud can take the form of any of the health insurance frauds described above. Senior citizens are frequent targets of Medicare schemes, especially by medical equipment manufacturers who offer seniors free medical products in exchange for their Medicare numbers. Because a physician has to sign a form certifying that equipment or testing is needed before Medicare pays for it, con artists fake signatures or bribe corrupt doctors to sign the forms. Once a signature is in place, the manufacturers bill Medicare for merchandise or service that was not needed or was not ordered.

Tips for Avoiding Health Care Fraud or Health Insurance Fraud:

* Never sign blank insurance claim forms.
* Never give blanket authorization to a medical provider to bill for services rendered.
* Ask your medical providers what they will charge and what you will be expected to pay out-of-pocket.
* Carefully review your insurer’s explanation of the benefits statement. Call your insurer and provider if you have questions.
* Do not do business with door-to-door or telephone salespeople who tell you that services of medical equipment are free.
* Give your insurance/Medicare identification only to those who have provided you with medical services.
* Keep accurate records of all health care appointments.
* Know if your physician ordered equipment for you.

For more information:
- Heath Care Fraud webpage

October 6, 2010

Jury Convicts Decatur Real Estate Broker of Mortgage Loan Fraud

URBANA, IL—A federal jury deliberated approximately five and one-half hours before returning guilty verdicts on all nine counts of fraud charged against Decatur real estate broker Terry Hart for his participation in a real estate “flipping” scheme Hart’s sentencing is scheduled on Jan. 20, 2011. Trial began in Urbana federal court on Sept. 21.

Hart, 58, of the 1400 block of Post Court, Decatur, was a licensed real estate broker who operated Hart Realty in Decatur when he was indicted in March 2008 with two co-defendants, Diane Shelton, 62, of the 1700 block of East Barrington, Decatur, formerly a loan officer at Staley Credit Union in Decatur, and Mark Brown, 45, of Moweaqua, Illinois, a former licensed real estate appraiser who operated a real estate appraisal business in Decatur, Illinois. The three were each charged with nine counts of mail fraud related to their participation in a scheme to defraud Staley Credit Union and various buyers of real estate in Decatur from 2002 to July 2005.

On June 22, 2009, Brown entered pleas of guilty to the nine counts of fraud. Shelton pled guilty to the nine counts on Oct. 1, 2009. Sentencing for both Brown and Shelton is scheduled on Nov. 12, 2010.

Evidence presented at trial showed the three participated in as many as 40 fraudulent real estate sale and financing transactions totaling more than $3 million in gross proceeds which generated profits to Hart of more than $600,000 and a potential loss to Staley Credit Union of more than $1 million. The defendants made false representations, including fraudulent appraisals prepared by Brown and used by Hart and Shelton, to cause buyers to purchase and Staley Credit

Union to finance residential real estate properties, some of which were owned by Hart and were financed at amounts substantially higher than their reasonable value. Hart and Shelton received payment of loan proceeds and paid appraisal fees and kickbacks to Brown. The charges are the result of an investigation by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Illinois State Police. Staley Credit Union cooperated and provided assistance in the investigation. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Timothy A. Bass.

Each offense of mail fraud carries a maximum statutory penalty of up to 30 years’ imprisonment and a fine of $1,000,000. Final sentences are determined by the court. In imposing sentence, the court may consider federal sentencing guidelines, which include a defendant’s criminal history, the amount of loss, and other applicable factors.

October 3, 2010

Texas Mortgage Broker Goes Down for Fraud

This Thursday a mortgage broker from San Antonio, TX pleaded guilty money laundering in a fifty-million dollar mortgage fraud scheme. We here at Loansafe.org report about mortgage fraud and real estate scams almost daily as the cases keep rounding up. The FBI, the Justice Department, state AGs, and the mortgage fraud task force have been doing an excellent job putting an end to these unscrupulous practices around the nation.

Ledale Lashette Coles, 36, signed a plea deal back in 2008 to the scheme, and this Thursday plead guilty before Judge John Primomo. Coles ran a company called Supreme Mortgage Group LLC that was used as just one of the entities involved in this massive mortgage fraud scheme. The scam was primarily blamed first on Robert Brooks from Dallas, TX.

Brooks, among his wife, Cheryl, are two out of 22 people that were indicted back in June for their part in the scheme. Each defendant in San Antonio took part in the “flipping” scam that caused over fifty-million dollars in loans to go into default.

Back on June 17th, the Justice department, the FBI, and the IRS named this investigation “Operation Stolen Dreams.”
In the indictment it stated that from May 17, 2005, through February 21, 2008, Robert purchased properties that were priced at the current market value, and later used “straw buyers” to buy the homes at inflated prices. It’s said he offered each straw buyer between $10-25k.

Other defendants include lawyer Richard Howard, former Sheriff’s Deputy George Autobee, a real estate agent out of San Antonio, mortgage processors, and escrow and title officers. It took quite a few individuals to orchestrate a scheme this large.

Brooks managed to get mortgages for the straw buyers using false information and then a year or so later let the properties go into default. According to additional indictment charges, Brook’s scheme could not be completed without assistance from other people in the mortgage industry, including appraisers, title officers, escrow officers, and mortgage processors who helped submit all of the false documentation and information to the banks.

Additional records show that Coles helped with more than a million dollars in fraudulent loans. Coles is now is facing up to 10 years in prison and is to be sentenced December 1 before US District Xavier Rodriguez.

By Evan Bedard on October 1, 2010 www.Loan-Safe.org
Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles and graphics for free.