Search


About

Flipping Frenzy.com is your source for news, information, and commentary on Real Estate and Mortgage Fraud. Click here to learn more.


Suspect Fraud?

If you believe you have been a victim of real estate or mortgage fraud, start here! Select your state from the pulldown menu below:

Articles

Our founder, Ralph Roberts, has written many eye-opening articles about Real Estate and Mortgage Fraud. Click here for more information.

Contact Ralph

If you would like to talk with us about a Real Estate or Mortgage Fraud-related matter, please click here.


Click Above for Info

Categories

Ralph's Latest Book: Click Above for Info

May 2012
S M T W T F S
« Jun    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Click Above for Info

Recent comments

The FBI Investigates Mortgage Fraud!

Recent posts

Archives

May 23, 2011

Hundreds Arrested in Mortgage Fraud Sweep

From industry insiders to straw buyers, nearly 500 people have been arrested in a nationwide mortgage fraud takedown that reflects the coordinated efforts of law enforcement to address the growing problem of crime in the housing industry.

“Mortgage fraud ruins lives, destroys families, and devastates whole communities,” Attorney General Eric Holder said this morning at a press conference to announce the results of “Operation Stolen Dreams.” Launched on March 1, 2010, the multi-agency initiative has led to a total of 485 arrests. More than 330 convictions have been obtained, and nearly $11 million has been recovered. Losses from a variety of fraud schemes are estimated to exceed $2 billion.
The subject identifies a house close to foreclosure. The straw buyer “purchases” the home, but immediately defaults on the mortgage by never making a payment. The subject goes to the lender and arranges a short sale — meaning the lender takes much less than is owed on the house. The lender never knew the short-sale (and resulting loss) were pre-meditated. The subject turns around and sells the house for full value

Operation Stolen Dreams is the government’s largest mortgage fraud takedown to date. But FBI Director Robert S. Mueller cautioned that there is still much work to be done. The Bureau is currently pursuing more than 3,000 mortgage fraud cases, he said, which is almost double the number from the last fiscal year.

“The staggering totals from this sweep highlight the mortgage fraud trends we are seeing around the country,” Attorney General Holder said. “We have seen mortgage fraud take on all shapes and sizes—from schemes that ensnared the elderly to fraudsters who targeted immigrant communities.”

A few examples:

In Miami yesterday, two people were arrested for targeting the Haitian-American community, claiming they would assist them with immigration and housing issues. Instead, they used victims’ personal information to produce false documents to obtain mortgage loans.
In California, a prominent home builder used straw buyers to sell his houses at inflated prices. The scheme inflated prices on other homes in the area, creating artificially high comparable sales and affecting the overall new-home market.
And in Detroit yesterday, FBI agents arrested several individuals in a $130 million scheme orchestrated by the local chapter of a motorcycle gang. The conspirators posed as mortgage brokers, appraisers, real estate agents, and title agents and used straw buyers to obtain around 500 mortgages on only 180 properties.

To combat the problem, the Bureau’s National Mortgage Fraud Task Force helps identify mortgage frauds such as loan origination schemes, short sales, property flipping, and equity skimming.
2009 Mortgage Fraud report
2009 Mortgage Fraud Report

In addition, we have 23 mortgage fraud task forces in “hot spots” around the country, from California and Texas to Florida and New York. Our investigators and analysts also participate in 67 working groups nationwide that share intelligence and industry data to identify emerging threats.

“FBI agents and analysts are using intelligence, enhanced surveillance, and undercover operations to identify emerging trends and to find the key players behind large-scale fraud,” Mueller said.

Unlike previous mortgage fraud sweeps, Operation Stolen Dreams focused not only on federal criminal cases, but also on civil enforcement and restitution for victims. Federal agencies participating included the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Treasury Department, the Federal Trade Commission, the Internal Revenue Service, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and the U.S. Secret Service. Many state and local agencies were also involved in the operation.

“From home buyers to lenders, mortgage fraud has had a resounding impact on the nation’s economy,” Mueller added. “Those who prey on the housing market should know that hundreds of FBI agents on task forces and their law enforcement partners are tracking down your schemes, and you will be brought to justice.”

May 17, 2011

Owner of New Jersey Foreclosure Rescue Companies Guilty of $10 Million Fraud

NEWARK, NJ—A West Orange, NJ ., man who owned and operated multiple foreclosure rescue companies admitted today to his role in a mortgage fraud scheme that defrauded numerous mortgage lenders of over $10 million, United States Attorney Paul J Fishman announced. Ronald Harris Jr, 41, of Piscataway, NJ ., pleaded guilty before United States Magistrate Judge Patty Shwartz to an information charging him with one count each of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering. Judge Shwartz recommended to United States District Judge Faith S Hochberg that his plea of guilty be accepted and entered. According to documents filed in this case and statements made during Harris’ guilty plea proceeding: Harris owned and operated Harris Capital and Skyline Capital Group, both of which held themselves out as foreclosure rescue companies and operated out of offices in Newark and later, Maplewood, NJ.

Harris admitted that he and other individuals, including Harris Capital employee Sterling Bruce, 37, of Newark, fraudulently promised to help homeowners avoid foreclosure, keep their homes, and repair their damaged credit by directing the homeowners to allow title to their homes to be put in the names of third party purchasers, or straw buyers, for approximately six month to one year. Harris told the homeowners that during that time period, he and others would help them obtain more favorable mortgages and improve their credit ratings. The homeowners were told that the titles to their homes would be returned to them. After the homeowners were signed up, Harris, Bruce, and others recruited individuals with good credit scores to act as straw buyers of the distressed properties.

The straw buyers were told that they were helping someone save his or her home and that they would make money when they sold the property back to the current owner after approximately one year. Once the distressed homeowners and straw buyers were in place, Harris, Bruce, Pia Perkinson, 39, of Parlin, NJ.—a mortgage loan officer at a number of different mortgage loan companies—and others caused loan applications to be sent in the straw buyers’ names to mortgage lenders. To increase the credit-worthiness of the straw buyers and to ensure that they would be approved for the loans, Harris, Bruce, Perkinson, and others submitted loan applications containing material false personal and financial information about the straw buyers, such as misstating their employment, income, and assets. For example, many of the straw buyers’ loan applications falsely stated that they worked for one of Harris’ companies making a substantial salary.

Harris would also regularly submit fraudulent supporting documents with the loan applications to support the false statements, such as fake employment records and fake investment account statements. Prior to the closings of these fraudulent transactions, Harris and Bruce regularly filed fraudulent liens for tens of thousands of dollars on the properties. At the closings of the transactions, the liens would be paid off with the proceeds of the fraudulently obtained loans and Harris and Bruce would enrich themselves. Harris admitted that he regularly laundered these loan proceeds through various bank accounts he controlled.

In total, Harris and his co-conspirators caused lenders to fund dozens of fraudulent loans that totaled more than $10 million. Of that amount, Harris received approximately $1,145,993. The wire fraud conspiracy count to which Harris pleaded guilty carries a maximum potential penalty of 30 years in prison and a fine of up to $1 million. The money laundering conspiracy count carries a maximum potential penalty of 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000.

Sentencing is currently scheduled for September 13, 2011. Bruce previously pleaded guilty before Judge Shwartz to one count of wire fraud conspiracy relating to his role in the mortgage foreclosure rescue scheme. He is currently scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Hochberg on September 12, 2011. Perkinson also previously pleaded guilty before Judge Shwartz to one count of wire fraud conspiracy.

During her guilty plea, Perkinson admitted to submitting fraudulent loan applications to various lenders, as well as taking out at least two fraudulent loans herself. A sentencing date has not yet been determined. Sabir Muhammad, 47, of South Plainfield, NJ ., was charged along with Harris in the initial complaint, and the charges against him remain pending. United States Attorney Fishman credited postal inspectors of the United States Postal Inspection Service, under the direction of Inspector in Charge Thomas E Boyle; special agents of the FBI, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Michael B Ward; and special agents of the IRS, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Victor W Lessoff, with the investigation leading to today’s guilty plea.

The government is represented by Assistant United States Attorneys Matthew E Beck and Aaron Mendelsohn of the United States Attorney’s Office Economic Crimes Unit in Newark. The charges contained in the complaint against Muhammad are merely accusations, and the defendant is considered innocent unless and until proven guilty. This case was brought in coordination with President Barack Obama’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force. President Obama established the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to wage an aggressive, coordinated, and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes.

The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general, and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes. Defense counsel: Alan D Bowman Esq ., Newark

Reported by: FBI

February 5, 2011

California Real Estate Executive Pleads Guilty to Bid Rigging at Public Foreclosure Auctions

A real estate executive pleaded guilty today in U.S. District Court in Sacramento, California, to conspiring to rig bids and commit mail fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions held in San Joaquin County, California, Christine Varney, Assistant Attorney General of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division, and Benjamin B. Wagner, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of California, announced.

Richard W. Northcutt pleaded guilty to conspiring with a group of real estate speculators who agreed not to bid against each other at certain public real estate foreclosure auctions in San Joaquin County. The primary purpose of the conspiracy was to suppress and restrain competition and to obtain selected real estate offered at San Joaquin County public foreclosure auctions at non-competitive prices, the department said in court papers.

According to the court documents, after the conspirators’ designated bidder bought a property at a public auction, they would hold a second, private auction, at which each participating conspirator would bid the amount above the public auction price he or she was willing to pay. The conspirator who bid the highest amount at the end of the private auction won the property. The difference between the price at the public auction and that at the second auction was the group’s illicit profit, and it was divided among the conspirators in payoffs. According to his plea agreement, Northcutt participated in the scheme from September 2008 until October 2009.

To date, including Northcutt, four individuals have pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California in connection with this investigation. On April 16, 2010, Anthony B. Ghio pleaded guilty to participating in a conspiracy to rig bids at public foreclosure auctions held in San Joaquin County. On June 24, 2010, John R. Vanzetti and Theodore B. Hutz also pleaded guilty in Sacramento to participating in the conspiracy.

“With our law enforcement partners, we are vigorously pursuing bid rigging conspiracies in real estate foreclosure auctions that allow individuals to gain illegal profits and take advantage of adverse situations,” said Assistant Attorney General Varney. “The Antitrust Division has expanded its investigation into anticompetitive practices in real estate foreclosure auctions beyond the Sacramento area into northern California.”

“By rigging public auctions of foreclosed properties, the defendants who have pleaded guilty as a result of this investigation illegally manipulated the market for residential real estate,” said U.S. Attorney Wagner. “Improving the transparency and integrity of that market is a principal objective of these prosecutions. The investigation will continue.”

Northcutt pleaded guilty to bid rigging, a violation of the Sherman Act, which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $1 million fine. The maximum fine may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims of the crime, if either of those amounts is greater than the statutory maximum fine. Northcutt also pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit mail fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine.

These charges arose from an ongoing federal antitrust investigation of fraud and bidding irregularities in certain real estate auctions in San Joaquin County. The investigation is being conducted by the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Office, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of California, the FBI’s Sacramento Division, and the San Joaquin County District Attorney’s Office. Trial attorneys Barbara Nelson and Tai Milder from the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Office and Assistant U.S. Attorney Russell L. Carlberg are prosecuting the case.

Today’s charges are part of efforts underway by President Barack Obama’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force. President Obama established the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to wage an aggressive, coordinated, and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general, and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and, with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes. One component of the task force is the national Mortgage Fraud Working Group, co-chaired by U.S. Attorney Wagner. For more information on the task force, visit www.StopFraud.gov.

Anyone with information concerning bid rigging or fraud related to real estate foreclosure auctions should contact the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Office at 415-436-6660 or visit www.justice.gov/atr/contact/newcase.htm, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of California at 916-554-2700, or the FBI’s Sacramento Division at 916-481-9110

February 1, 2011

Crofton Loan Officer Sentenced to 27 Months in Prison in Mortgage Fraud Scheme

BALTIMORE, MD—U.S. District Judge J. Frederick Motz sentenced James William Fox II, age 40, of Crofton, Maryland today to 27 months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release, for conspiracy to commit wire fraud in connection with a mortgage fraud scheme which he promised to help homeowners facing foreclosure keep their homes, but left them with no equity and no longer holding the title to their properties. At today’s sentencing hearing Judge Motz also ordered that Fox pay restitution in the full amount of the loss, which the government contends is between $1 million and $2.4 million.

The sentence was announced by United States Attorney for the District of Maryland Rod J. Rosenstein; Special Agent in Charge Richard A. McFeely of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and Special Agent in Charge Ken Taylor, Jr. of the Housing and Urban Development Office of Inspector General—Office of Investigations.

According to Fox’s plea agreement, he met James Hooper Dan, age 45, of Annapolis, Maryland, when both were loan officers at a mortgage brokerage in Annapolis. Beginning in 2006, Fox began to identify prospective borrowers who owned and had equity in their homes, but who could not afford their mortgage payments and were at risk of losing their homes because they were either in foreclosure, bankruptcy or financial distress. Fox, and sometimes Fox and Dan, told potential victims that they could “rescue” them and save their houses. The promises involved transferring the home to Fox or Dan, who would obtain a new mortgage loan. Fox and Dan promised to make the payments on the new mortgage loan for six months or a year, during which time the individual would “repair” their credit, refinance the property and reacquire it. During this six month or one-year period, the individual was to continue living in the house.

In order to obtain the mortgage loans in their names, Fox and Dan made materially false and fraudulent loan applications including falsification of their intent to occupy the property, annual income, savings, other properties owned, and source of the borrower’s funds for closing. Fox was typically the loan officer for Dan’s loans and was aware of Dan’s material misrepresentations.

According to the plea agreement, from April 20, 2006 through July 5, 2007, Fox and Dan transferred eight properties from financially distressed homeowners to themselves or straw purchasers they recruited. The properties were located in Waldorf, Capitol Heights, Baltimore, Silver Spring, Pasadena and Hagerstown, Maryland, as well as Glen Rock, Pennsylvania and Chesterfield, Virginia. The settlement statements (sometimes called HUD-1s) used at the settlements were false. In each instance, Fox, Dan, or the straw purchaser was supposed to produce the buyer’s funds to close at settlement from their own resources. These funds actually came from the seller’s proceeds, or from money borrowed from others, so that Fox invested no funds of his own in any transaction. Although Fox and Dan were the buyers of the properties, they obtained proceeds from the equity in the properties by making material false representations to financial institutions making the loans. In addition, the sellers paid over to Fox and Dan, or one of their companies, monies that were identified on the HUD-1 as the sellers’ proceeds of the property sales. Fox and Dan shared some of these proceeds with the sellers either directly or by paying off sellers’ debts, but put the remainder in their own bank accounts. Although Fox and Dan made some mortgage payments on each of the properties, they eventually defaulted on the mortgage loans, and all eight properties went into default. The victims do not have title of their homes.

Dan previously pleaded guilty to the same charge and is scheduled to be sentenced on February 25, 2011 at 10:30 a.m.

The Maryland Mortgage Fraud Task Force was established to unify the agencies that regulate and investigate mortgage fraud and promote the early detection, identification, prevention and prosecution of mortgage fraud schemes. This case, as well as other cases brought by members of the Task Force, demonstrates the commitment of law enforcement agencies to protect consumers from fraud and promote the integrity of the credit markets. Information about mortgage fraud prosecutions is available http://www.justice.gov/usao/md/Mortgage-Fraud/index.html.

This law enforcement action is part of President Barack Obama’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force. President Obama established the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to wage an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general, and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes.

United States Attorney Rod J. Rosenstein thanked the Maryland Crime Victims’ Resource Center, Inc. for their assistance to victims in this case.

United States Attorney Rod J. Rosenstein thanked the FBI and HUD-OIG, Office of Investigations for their work in this investigation and commended Assistant U.S. Attorney Joyce K. McDonald, who prosecuted the case.

January 25, 2011

Eight Sentenced in Multimillion-Dollar Mortgage Fraud and Foreclosure Rescue Schemes

LEV L. DASSIN, the Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced that ALEKSANDER LIPKIN, a/k/a “Alex,” GARRI ZHIGUN, GALINA ZHIGUN, JOSEPH PAPERNY, FAINA PETROVSKAYA, JOHN GELIN, TOMER SINAI, and DANIEL MIKHLIN were each sentenced by United States District Judge RICHARD J. HOLWELL in Manhattan federal court for their roles in a multimillion-dollar, sub-prime mortgage fraud scheme, as charged in United States v. Aleksander Lipkin, et al., S2 06 Cr. 1179. LIPKIN was sentenced to 110 months in prison for his role as a leader of the mortgage fraud scheme as well as his involvement in another foreclosure rescue scheme charged in United States v. Maurice McDowall, et al..

According to the Indictment, other documents filed in the case, and statements made during the various guilty plea and sentencing proceedings:

From 2004 through January 2007, LIPKIN was a leader in a wide-ranging mortgage fraud scheme involving mortgage brokers and loan processors who worked at the Brooklyn mortgage brokerage firm, AGA Capital NY, Inc., and its successors, as well as real estate appraisers, loan account executives, a paralegal, a lawyer, straw buyers, and others. LIPKIN and his co-defendants submitted loan applications containing false information and material omissions, as well as other false documentation such as bank statements, to obtain loans that otherwise would not have been funded. For example, acting through straw purchasers, LIPKIN and his partner, GARRI ZHIGUN, purchased a block of ten rent-regulated condominium apartments in a building on Manhattan’s Upper West Side. LIPKIN, GARRI ZHIGUN and their associates obtained mortgages for the straw purchasers to finance 100 percent of the purchase price of the Apartments. However, none of the documents submitted to the lenders disclosed that certain buyers were seeking to purchase more than one apartment as a “primary residence,” or that the apartment was already occupied and therefore unsuitable for a primary residence, or that the apartment was subject to rent regulation laws.

Then, only months after initial purchase of the block of apartments, LIPKIN, GARRI ZHIGUN and their co-defendants resold, or “flipped,” the apartments to other straw-buyers, at prices almost twice the amount of the initial purchase price. They did so by submitting false information and documents to various lenders, and thus obtained almost $13 million in additional loans. Most of those additional loans are now in foreclosure.

During the course of the mortgage fraud scheme, AGA Capital, and its successors, brokered over one thousand home mortgages and home equity loans with a total face value of at least $200 million dollars and earned at least $4 million in commission fees on the loans. The various lenders defrauded by the scheme have claimed actual losses of approximately $11.6 million on loans that have completed foreclosure.

Of the 27 defendants charged in United States v. Aleksander Lipkin, et al., 25 pleaded guilty; one of the defendants — ALEXANDER KAPLAN — was found guilty following a jury trial and is scheduled to be sentenced on September 10, 2009.

In addition to the 110-month prison term, LIPKIN, 30, was sentenced to five years’ supervised release. Judge HOLWELL also sentenced LIPKIN to a concurrent term of 110 months’ in prison for his role in a separate mortgage foreclosure rescue scheme to which LIPKIN pleaded guilty in United States v. Maurice McDowall, et al., 07 Cr. 1054. LIPKIN was also ordered to forfeit $7 million and pay approximately $11.6 million in restitution.

GARRI ZHIGUN and JOSEPH PAPERNY were sentenced by Judge HOLWELL on May 28, 2009. GARRI ZHIGUN, 32, supervised the operations of AGA Capital and was LIPKIN’s business partner, as described above. GARRI ZHIGUN was sentenced to 100 months in prison, three years’ supervised release, and was ordered to forfeit $2.5 million and pay approximately $11.6 million in restitution. JOSEPH PAPERNY, 36, was a mortgage broker and was sentenced to 30 months in prison, three years’ supervised release, and was also ordered to forfeit $1 million and pay approximately $11.6 million in restitution.

GALINA ZHIGUN and FAINA PETROVSKAYA were sentenced by Judge HOLWELL on May 21, 2009. GALINA ZHIGUN, 55, was the record owner and registered broker of AGA Capital and was sentenced to 38 months in prison and three years’ supervised release. In addition, GALINA ZHIGUN was ordered to pay a fine of $7,500, forfeit $1 million, and pay $1 million in restitution. PETROVSKAYA, 36, was a loan processor and was sentenced to time served, 30 months’ supervised release with six months of home confinement, and was also ordered to pay a fine of $2,000.

JOHN GELIN, TOMER SINAI, and DANIEL MIKHLIN were sentenced by JUDGE HOLWELL on May 20, 2009. JOHN GELIN, 41, was one of the investors who recruited and used straw buyers to purchase real estate and created fake bank statements and other fraudulent documents to submit to lenders. GELIN was sentenced to 36 months in prison, three years’ supervised release and was ordered to forfeit $1 million and pay approximately $11.6 million in restitution. SINAI, 31, was a licensed real estate appraiser who inflated appraisals for the defendants. SINAI was sentenced to 9 months in prison, three years’ supervised release, and was ordered to forfeit $70,000. MIKHLIN, 32, was a mortgage broker and was sentenced to 27 months in prison, three years’ supervised release, and was ordered to forfeit $240,000 and pay approximately $11.6 million in restitution.

Mr. DASSIN praised the efforts of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the New York City Police Department, and the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. He also thanked the New York State Attorney General’s Office for its outstanding work in the investigation.

Assistant United States Attorneys JONATHAN B. NEW and AVI WEITZMAN are in charge of the prosecutions in United States v. Alexander Lipkin et al. Assistant United States Attorneys JULIAN J. MOORE and JOHN T. ZACH are in charge of the prosecutions in United States v. Maurice McDowall, et al.

January 22, 2011

Manhattan Federal Court Paralegal Sentenced to Three Years in Prison for Role in Multimillion-Dollar Mortgage Fraud and Foreclosure Rescue Schemes

PREET BHARARA, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced that MARINA DUBIN, a real estate paralegal, was sentenced yesterday to two concurrent three-year prison sentences in connection with her involvement in a multimillion-dollar, sub-prime mortgage fraud scheme and another foreclosure rescue scheme. DUBIN, 33, of Brooklyn, New York, pleaded guilty to two counts of conspiracy to commit mail, wire, and bank fraud on June 12, 2008, before United States District Judge RICHARD J. HOLWELL, who also imposed the sentence yesterday in Manhattan federal court.

According to the Indictment, other documents filed in these and related cases, and statements made in court:

The Mortgage Fraud Scheme

From 2004 through January 2007, DUBIN was a paralegal who acted as the bank attorney and settlement agent for numerous loans obtained by the participants in a wide-ranging mortgage fraud scheme. The scheme was led by ALEKSANDER LIPKIN, 31, of Brooklyn, New York, and other participants included mortgage brokers and loan processors who worked at the Brooklyn mortgage brokerage firm AGA Capital NY, Inc. (“AGA Capital”) and its successors, as well as real estate appraisers, loan account executives, a lawyer, straw buyers, and others. DUBIN and her co-defendants submitted loan applications containing false information and material omissions, as well as other false documentation such as bank statements, to obtain loans that otherwise would not have been funded.

During the course of the mortgage fraud scheme, AGA Capital and its successors brokered over 1,000 home mortgages and home equity loans with a total face value of at least $200 million dollars and earned at least $4 million in commission fees on those loans. The various lenders defrauded by the scheme have claimed actual losses of approximately $11.6 million on loans that have completed foreclosure.

Of the 27 defendants charged in this case (United States v. Aleksander Lipkin, et al.), 25 pleaded guilty; one of the defendants, attorney ALEXANDER KAPLAN, 35, of Brooklyn, New York, was found guilty following a jury trial and is scheduled to be sentenced on April 6, 2010.

GARRI ZHIGUN, 33, of Brooklyn, New York, who supervised the operations of AGA Capital and was LIPKIN’s business partner, was sentenced on May 28, 2009, by Judge HOLWELL to 100 months in prison, three years of supervised release, and was ordered to forfeit $2.5 million and pay approximately $11.6 million in restitution.

The Foreclosure Rescue Scheme

From November 2003 through April 2005, MAURICE McDOWALL, 55, of Brooklyn, New York, LIPKIN and DUBIN engaged in a fraud scheme targeting homeowners whose homes, primarily in Brooklyn and Bronx, New York, were in foreclosure or facing foreclosure, by offering them a plan to “save” their homes. The proposed plan included the refinancing of the homeowners’ debt with new, larger mortgages. Because the distressed homeowners typically had poor credit and were not eligible to refinance their debt at favorable terms, the defendants induced them to “sell” their homes to straw buyers, who would apply for loans to be used to “save” the home. The defendants promised that once the straw buyer obtained the mortgage, the proceeds would be used to pay off the homeowners’ old debt and make one year’s worth of payments on the new loans. The homeowners were told that, during that year, they could continue to live in their homes and work on improving their finances and credit. Finally, the defendants explained to the homeowners that, at the end of the year, the title to their homes would be returned to them by the straw buyers, with their credit repaired and their homes saved. There were also cases in which the defendants did not explain to homeowners that the plan to “save” their home required them to deed their house to a third party and did not obtain permission to deed the homes to others. In such cases, the defendants effectively stole the property of the homeowners by forging the homeowners’ signatures on various documents that transferred the homes to straw buyers without the homeowners’ knowledge.

McDOWALL, who directed the daily operations of the scheme, and LIPKIN, a mortgage broker who coordinated the submission of fraudulent information to lenders on behalf of straw buyers, obtained more than 80 home mortgages and/or equity loans valued at over $20 million. In some instances, the defendants failed to make even one payment on the loans, causing the loans to default immediately; in nearly every other case, they eventually failed to make the payments and defaulted on the loans, thereby “cashing out” on the properties. As a result, the distressed homeowners lost the titles to their homes and faced eviction, the straw buyers owed the lenders hundreds of thousands of dollars that they were unable to repay, and the lenders suffered losses from the defaulted loans.

DUBIN served as the settlement agent for the vast majority of the fraudulent loans obtained in the course of the scheme. In that capacity, she organized closings, prepared documents, and disbursed the fraudulently obtained proceeds to various defendants.

McDOWALL was previously sentenced by United States District Judge ROBERT P. PATTERSON to 120 months in prison and three years of supervised release, with 100 hours of community service to be performed in the first year after release. In addition, Judge PATTERSON ordered McDOWALL to forfeit $2.5 million.

Of the three other defendants charged in this case, one pleaded guilty and the other two were found guilty on charges of conspiracy, wire fraud, and bank fraud, following a 12-day jury trial in Manhattan federal court.

LIPKIN was sentenced by Judge HOLWELL for his role in both the mortgage fraud scheme and the foreclosure rescue scheme (United States v. Maurice McDowall, et al.) on June 4, 2009, to 110 months in prison, five years of supervised release, and was ordered to forfeit $7 million and pay approximately $11.6 million in restitution.

In addition to the 36-month prison term, DUBIN was sentenced to three years of supervised release. Judge HOLWELL also ordered DUBIN to forfeit $7 million and pay approximately $11.6 million in restitution.

Mr. BHARARA praised the work of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the New York City Police Department, and the Department of Homeland Security’s U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. He also thanked the New York State Attorney General’s Office for its role in the investigation.

This case was brought in coordination with President BARACK OBAMA’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, on which Mr. BHARARA serves as a Co-Chair of the Securities and Commodities Fraud Working Group. President OBAMA established the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to wage an aggressive, coordinated, and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general, and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes.

This case is being prosecuted by the Office’s Organized Crime Unit. Assistant United States Attorneys JONATHAN B. NEW, AVI WEITZMAN, JULIAN J. MOORE, and JOHN T. ZACH are in charge of the prosecutions.

January 16, 2011

‘Malicious’ Mortgage Fraud More Than 400 Charged Nationwide

Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip and FBI Director Robert Mueller announced the results of “Operation Malicious Mortgage,” a massive multiagency takedown of mortgage fraud schemes involving more than 400 defendants nationwide who have been charged over the past three and a half months.
The operation focused primarily on three types of mortgage fraud—lending fraud, foreclosure rescue schemes, and mortgage-related bankruptcy schemes. “To persons who are involved in such schemes, we will find you, you will be investigated, and you will be prosecuted,” said Mueller. “To those who would contemplate misleading, engaging in such schemes, you will spend time in jail.”
Among the 400-plus subjects of Operation Malicious Mortgage, there have been 173 convictions and 81 sentencings so far for crimes that have accounted for more than $1 billion in estimated losses. Forty-six of our 56 field offices around the country took part in the operation, which has secured more than $60 million in assets.
During its investigative phase, we worked closely with our partner agencies—including the Postal Inspection Service, Internal Revenue Service, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Secret Service, U.S. Trustee Program, and the Inspector General Offices of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Department of Veterans Affairs, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
The FBI’s mortgage fraud caseload has doubled in the past three years to more than 1,400 pending cases. To address this steady growth, Mueller noted that every FBI field office focuses on this criminal priority. The Bureau also takes part in 42 mortgage fraud task forces and working groups. And we continue our joint efforts with federal, state, and local agencies.
“Our objective, as always,” said Mueller, ”is to protect the consumer and stabilize our economic markets.”
Among the Bureau’s mortgage fraud cases are 19 sub-prime-related corporate fraud investigations. Most of these corporate fraud investigations, said Mueller, deal with accounting fraud, with insider trading, and with criminal intent, the failure to disclose the proper valuations of the securitized loans and derivatives.
Deputy Attorney General Filip also said that the Justice Departments remains committed to investigating and prosecuting cases of mortgage-related securities fraud, noting today’s announcement of an indictment against two senior managers of failed Bear Stearns hedge funds.

December 15, 2010

Charges and Civil Complaint Filed in Foreclosure Rescue Scheme

Civil Complaint Seeks Help for Scam Victims Facing Foreclosure

PHILADELPHIA—An indictment was unsealed and a verified civil complaint was filed today against Anthony J. DeMarco, III and his real estate companies, DeMarco REI, Inc. (“DeMarco REI”) and OPM Group, LLC, (“OPM”), alleging a mortgage fraud scheme involving more than $30 million in loans, announced United States Attorney Zane David Memeger. The civil complaint seeks a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against defendant. It also seeks to forestall foreclosures against the victims. The indictment charges DeMarco, Michael Richard Roberts, Sean Ryan McBride, and Eric Bascove with conspiracy; charges DeMarco, Roberts, and McBride with mail, wire, and bank fraud; and charges DeMarco with money laundering. DeMarco and Roberts were arrested this morning.
DeMarco, who operated the real estate investment firm DeMarco REI, Inc., headquartered in Center City, Philadelphia, employed Roberts and Bascove. DeMarco’s business claimed to be able to assist homeowners facing imminent foreclosure. McBride was a title agent at Settlement Engine, Inc., in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. According to the indictment, from June 2008 through December 2008, the defendants would scour public records filings to find homeowners in financial distress and pitch a “sale-leaseback” arrangement to them. The pitch was that the real estate company would buy the homeowner’s house, the homeowner would remain in the house and pay rent to the real estate company, and when the homeowner got back on his or her feet financially, the homeowner could buy back the house. The defendants further claimed that if there was equity in the house at the time of the sale to DeMarco REI, then DeMarco REI would put that money into an escrow or rent reserve account for the homeowner. Instead, the defendants used fraudulent documents to obtain mortgage loans from lenders and stole the equity in the homes. It is further alleged that DeMarco and his employees would solicit straw purchasers for these properties, providing them with the down payment for the mortgage and telling them that the real estate investment firm would make the monthly mortgage payments. The result of the scheme is that the mortgage lenders were stuck with loans that are in default, the “straw” purchasers own houses that are going into foreclosure, and the original homeowners face eviction from their own homes once the foreclosures are complete.
The indictment alleges that DeMarco used the proceeds of the scheme to pay his personal and business expenses; that McBride conducted fraudulent real estate closings as part of the scheme; and that the defendants created fraudulent mortgage documents.
The verified complaint seeks novel relief that will bring all the individuals and entities that have a stake in the properties (the homeowners, the “straw” purchasers, and the mortgage lenders) before the court to create an orderly process by which the damage caused by the defendants’ alleged fraud can be mitigated. The goal of the process is to have the parties work towards finding a solution other than foreclosure—perhaps a loan modification, perhaps a forbearance agreement, perhaps a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. The orderly process sought by today’s filings is the best way to ensure that the greatest number of original homeowners have an opportunity to save their homes.
NAME ADDRESS AGE
Anthony James DeMarco Conshohocken, PA 31
Michael Richard Roberts Sweedesboro, NJ 29
Sean Ryan McBride Pittsburgh, PA 36
Eric Bascove Philadelphia, PA 37
If convicted of all charges: DeMarco faces a maximum possible sentence of 200 years’ imprisonment, a $5 million fine, and a five-year period of supervised release; Roberts faces a maximum possible sentence of 150 years’ imprisonment, a $3.75 million fine, and a five-year period of supervised release; McBride faces a maximum possible sentence of 230 years’ imprisonment, a $6 million fine, and a five-year period of supervised release; Bascove faces a maximum possible sentence of 60 years’ imprisonment, a $2 million fine, and a five-year period of supervised release.
The case was investigated by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the United States Postal Inspection Service. The criminal case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Karen L. Grigsby. This civil case is being handled by Assistant United States Attorneys Michael S. Blume and Stacey L. B. Smith.

Paralegal Sentenced in Manhattan Federal Court to Prison for Mortgage Fraud and Foreclosure Rescue Schemes

PREET BHARARA, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced that MARINA DUBIN, a real estate paralegal, was sentenced yesterday to two concurrent three-year prison sentences in connection with her involvement in a multimillion-dollar, sub-prime mortgage fraud scheme and another foreclosure rescue scheme. DUBIN, 33, of Brooklyn, New York, pleaded guilty to two counts of conspiracy to commit mail, wire, and bank fraud on June 12, 2008, before United States District Judge RICHARD J. HOLWELL, who also imposed the sentence yesterday in Manhattan federal court.

According to the Indictment, other documents filed in these and related cases, and statements made in court:

The Mortgage Fraud Scheme

From 2004 through January 2007, DUBIN was a paralegal who acted as the bank attorney and settlement agent for numerous loans obtained by the participants in a wide-ranging mortgage fraud scheme. The scheme was led by ALEKSANDER LIPKIN, 31, of Brooklyn, New York, and other participants included mortgage brokers and loan processors who worked at the Brooklyn mortgage brokerage firm AGA Capital NY, Inc. (“AGA Capital”) and its successors, as well as real estate appraisers, loan account executives, a lawyer, straw buyers, and others. DUBIN and her co-defendants submitted loan applications containing false information and material omissions, as well as other false documentation such as bank statements, to obtain loans that otherwise would not have been funded.

During the course of the mortgage fraud scheme, AGA Capital and its successors brokered over 1,000 home mortgages and home equity loans with a total face value of at least $200 million dollars and earned at least $4 million in commission fees on those loans. The various lenders defrauded by the scheme have claimed actual losses of approximately $11.6 million on loans that have completed foreclosure.

Of the 27 defendants charged in this case (United States v. Aleksander Lipkin, et al.), 25 pleaded guilty; one of the defendants, attorney ALEXANDER KAPLAN, 35, of Brooklyn, New York, was found guilty following a jury trial and is scheduled to be sentenced on April 6, 2010.

GARRI ZHIGUN, 33, of Brooklyn, New York, who supervised the operations of AGA Capital and was LIPKIN’s business partner, was sentenced on May 28, 2009, by Judge HOLWELL to 100 months in prison, three years of supervised release, and was ordered to forfeit $2.5 million and pay approximately $11.6 million in restitution.

The Foreclosure Rescue Scheme

From November 2003 through April 2005, MAURICE McDOWALL, 55, of Brooklyn, New York, LIPKIN and DUBIN engaged in a fraud scheme targeting homeowners whose homes, primarily in Brooklyn and Bronx, New York, were in foreclosure or facing foreclosure, by offering them a plan to “save” their homes. The proposed plan included the refinancing of the homeowners’ debt with new, larger mortgages. Because the distressed homeowners typically had poor credit and were not eligible to refinance their debt at favorable terms, the defendants induced them to “sell” their homes to straw buyers, who would apply for loans to be used to “save” the home. The defendants promised that once the straw buyer obtained the mortgage, the proceeds would be used to pay off the homeowners’ old debt and make one year’s worth of payments on the new loans. The homeowners were told that, during that year, they could continue to live in their homes and work on improving their finances and credit. Finally, the defendants explained to the homeowners that, at the end of the year, the title to their homes would be returned to them by the straw buyers, with their credit repaired and their homes saved. There were also cases in which the defendants did not explain to homeowners that the plan to “save” their home required them to deed their house to a third party and did not obtain permission to deed the homes to others. In such cases, the defendants effectively stole the property of the homeowners by forging the homeowners’ signatures on various documents that transferred the homes to straw buyers without the homeowners’ knowledge.

McDOWALL, who directed the daily operations of the scheme, and LIPKIN, a mortgage broker who coordinated the submission of fraudulent information to lenders on behalf of straw buyers, obtained more than 80 home mortgages and/or equity loans valued at over $20 million. In some instances, the defendants failed to make even one payment on the loans, causing the loans to default immediately; in nearly every other case, they eventually failed to make the payments and defaulted on the loans, thereby “cashing out” on the properties. As a result, the distressed homeowners lost the titles to their homes and faced eviction, the straw buyers owed the lenders hundreds of thousands of dollars that they were unable to repay, and the lenders suffered losses from the defaulted loans.

DUBIN served as the settlement agent for the vast majority of the fraudulent loans obtained in the course of the scheme. In that capacity, she organized closings, prepared documents, and disbursed the fraudulently obtained proceeds to various defendants.

McDOWALL was previously sentenced by United States District Judge ROBERT P. PATTERSON to 120 months in prison and three years of supervised release, with 100 hours of community service to be performed in the first year after release. In addition, Judge PATTERSON ordered McDOWALL to forfeit $2.5 million.

Of the three other defendants charged in this case, one pleaded guilty and the other two were found guilty on charges of conspiracy, wire fraud, and bank fraud, following a 12-day jury trial in Manhattan federal court.

LIPKIN was sentenced by Judge HOLWELL for his role in both the mortgage fraud scheme and the foreclosure rescue scheme (United States v. Maurice McDowall, et al.) on June 4, 2009, to 110 months in prison, five years of supervised release, and was ordered to forfeit $7 million and pay approximately $11.6 million in restitution.

In addition to the 36-month prison term, DUBIN was sentenced to three years of supervised release. Judge HOLWELL also ordered DUBIN to forfeit $7 million and pay approximately $11.6 million in restitution.

Mr. BHARARA praised the work of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the New York City Police Department, and the Department of Homeland Security’s U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. He also thanked the New York State Attorney General’s Office for its role in the investigation.

This case was brought in coordination with President BARACK OBAMA’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, on which Mr. BHARARA serves as a Co-Chair of the Securities and Commodities Fraud Working Group. President OBAMA established the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to wage an aggressive, coordinated, and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general, and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes.

This case is being prosecuted by the Office’s Organized Crime Unit. Assistant United States Attorneys JONATHAN B. NEW, AVI WEITZMAN, JULIAN J. MOORE, and JOHN T. ZACH are in charge of the prosecutions.

Posted By: Ralph Roberts @ 1:04 am | | Comments (0) | Trackback |
Filed under: Foreclosure Fraud,Loan Fraud,Mortgage Fraud,Mortgage Fraud Scheme,Straw Buyer

December 5, 2010

Third Person Charged for Role in Foreclosure Rescue Scheme That Involved $725 Million in Mortgages

Defendant Agrees to Plead Guilty After Co-Schemer Pled Earlier This Week
LOS ANGELES—With a new criminal case being filed this morning, federal authorities have now charged three defendants for their roles in a foreclosure rescue scam that promised the owners of hundreds of distressed properties that they could indefinitely postpone foreclosure sales.
Irving Cohen, 74, of Van Nuys, was charged late this morning in United States District Court with two counts of bankruptcy fraud. In a plea agreement also filed today, Cohen admitted his role in the scheme that filed fraudulent bankruptcies to delay foreclosures on more than 1,400 properties that had outstanding loans totaling nearly three-quarters of a billion dollars. As a result of the scheme, which continued through July, numerous lenders lost interest payments on the mortgages for up to three years, and Cohen and his associates collected nearly $550,000 in fees from homeowners.
A second defendant in this case, Robin Phillips, 53, of Claremont, pled guilty on Monday to one count of bankruptcy fraud. Phillips admitted to filing bankruptcies that delayed foreclosure on nearly 500 properties and affected more than $200 million of delinquent mortgages.
A third person allegedly involved in the scheme, Darwin Bowman, 74, of Van Nuys, was indicted in September by a federal grand jury on two counts of bankruptcy fraud. Bowman is currently scheduled to go on trial on February 8.
According to court documents filed in relation to all three cases, Cohen, Phillips, and Bowman were involved in a scheme that recruited homeowners whose properties were in danger of imminent foreclosure and promised to delay the foreclosures for as long as the homeowners could pay.
Once a homeowner paid a fee, typically $1,500 per month, Bowman and Cohen, either directly or through salespersons, had the homeowner sign a deed granting a one-eighth interest in the house to a fictitious person, according to court documents. Without the knowledge of the homeowner, Phillips and others filed a bankruptcy petition in the name of the fictitious person. Armed with the fraudulent bankruptcy petition and the deed in the name of the fictitious person, Cohen and Bowman contacted the mortgage lender to stop foreclosure proceedings. Because the filing of a bankruptcy gives rise to an “automatic stay” that protects a debtor’s property, the filings of the fictitious bankruptcy petitions forced lenders to cancel foreclosure sales and wait for the bankruptcy petitions to be dismissed. The lenders—small businesses, as well as large banks—had to pay lawyers to file motions to dismiss the bankruptcies in order to move forward to collect money that was owed to them.
Cohen started the scheme in late 2006. In 2007, Cohen recruited Bowman to join the scheme, which Bowman allegedly ran for a period in 2008 while Cohen was serving a jail sentence for a fraud conviction in state court. Phillips became involved in the scheme in 2008 after paying for foreclosure-avoidance services from Cohen and offering assistance in exchange for Cohen waiving his monthly fee. The scheme was shut down on July 28 when special agents with the Federal Bureau of Investigation executed a series of search warrants.
“In the wake of the housing crisis, foreclosure-rescue schemes have exploded in popularity, particularly in Southern California, where both homeowners and lenders have been victims of various frauds,” said United States Attorney André Birotte Jr. “Homeowners facing foreclosure need to exercise extreme caution when seeking assistance with their financial problems.”
Steven Martinez, Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI in Los Angeles, commented: “The defendants in this case exploited bankruptcy rules as they methodically victimized lenders in their scheme and targeted vulnerable homeowners while enriching themselves. The FBI will continue to pursue the various forms of fraud plaguing the housing market and urges homeowners to be skeptical when approached by individuals who offer to save their home for a fee.”
Peter Anderson, United States Trustee for the Central District of California (Region 16), stated: “Criminal bankruptcy fraud and, in particular, foreclosure rescue fraud schemes threaten the integrity of the bankruptcy system, as well as public confidence in that system. We deeply appreciate the strong commitment of U.S. Attorney André Birotte Jr. and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to combating bankruptcy fraud and abuse, as demonstrated by this case.”
Cohen will make his initial appearance in United States District Court on December 20.
Phillips is scheduled to be sentenced by United States District Judge John F. Walter on April 4.
The crime of bankruptcy fraud carries a statutory maximum sentence of five years in federal prison.
As for Bowman, it should be noted that an indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty in court.
The cases against Cohen, Phillips, and Bowman are the result of an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which received substantial assistant from the United States Trustee’s Office.

November 21, 2010

Hundreds Arrested in Mortgage Fraud Sweep

From industry insiders to straw buyers, nearly 500 people have been arrested in a nationwide mortgage fraud takedown that reflects the coordinated efforts of law enforcement to address the growing problem of crime in the housing industry.

“Mortgage fraud ruins lives, destroys families, and devastates whole communities,” Attorney General Eric Holder said this morning at a press conference to announce the results of “Operation Stolen Dreams.” Launched on March 1, 2010, the multi-agency initiative has led to a total of 485 arrests. More than 330 convictions have been obtained, and nearly $11 million has been recovered. Losses from a variety of fraud schemes are estimated to exceed $2 billion.
The subject identifies a house close to foreclosure. The straw buyer “purchases” the home, but immediately defaults on the mortgage by never making a payment. The subject goes to the lender and arranges a short sale — meaning the lender takes much less than is owed on the house. The lender never knew the short-sale (and resulting loss) were pre-meditated. The subject turns around and sells the house for full value

Operation Stolen Dreams is the government’s largest mortgage fraud takedown to date. But FBI Director Robert S. Mueller cautioned that there is still much work to be done. The Bureau is currently pursuing more than 3,000 mortgage fraud cases, he said, which is almost double the number from the last fiscal year.

“The staggering totals from this sweep highlight the mortgage fraud trends we are seeing around the country,” Attorney General Holder said. “We have seen mortgage fraud take on all shapes and sizes—from schemes that ensnared the elderly to fraudsters who targeted immigrant communities.”

A few examples:

* In Miami yesterday, two people were arrested for targeting the Haitian-American community, claiming they would assist them with immigration and housing issues. Instead, they used victims’ personal information to produce false documents to obtain mortgage loans.
* In California, a prominent home builder used straw buyers to sell his houses at inflated prices. The scheme inflated prices on other homes in the area, creating artificially high comparable sales and affecting the overall new-home market.
* And in Detroit yesterday, FBI agents arrested several individuals in a $130 million scheme orchestrated by the local chapter of a motorcycle gang. The conspirators posed as mortgage brokers, appraisers, real estate agents, and title agents and used straw buyers to obtain around 500 mortgages on only 180 properties.

To combat the problem, the Bureau’s National Mortgage Fraud Task Force helps identify mortgage frauds such as loan origination schemes, short sales, property flipping, and equity skimming.
2009 Mortgage Fraud report
2009 Mortgage Fraud Report

In addition, we have 23 mortgage fraud task forces in “hot spots” around the country, from California and Texas to Florida and New York. Our investigators and analysts also participate in 67 working groups nationwide that share intelligence and industry data to identify emerging threats.

“FBI agents and analysts are using intelligence, enhanced surveillance, and undercover operations to identify emerging trends and to find the key players behind large-scale fraud,” Mueller said.

Unlike previous mortgage fraud sweeps, Operation Stolen Dreams focused not only on federal criminal cases, but also on civil enforcement and restitution for victims. Federal agencies participating included the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Treasury Department, the Federal Trade Commission, the Internal Revenue Service, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and the U.S. Secret Service. Many state and local agencies were also involved in the operation.

“From home buyers to lenders, mortgage fraud has had a resounding impact on the nation’s economy,” Mueller added. “Those who prey on the housing market should know that hundreds of FBI agents on task forces and their law enforcement partners are tracking down your schemes, and you will be brought to justice.”

October 29, 2010

Mortgage fraud, bank bailouts continue

The lifting of the major banks’ “foreclosure moratoriums” — which had been instituted to stem the outcry over massive fraud in the processing of foreclosure documents — demonstrates the necessity for the working class to launch a struggle to win a genuine two-year moratorium on foreclosures and evictions predicated on the premise that housing is a fundamental human right.

With the federal government having essentially nationalized the mortgage industry, the president has the authority to implement such a moratorium through executive action.

Bank of America on Oct. 18 announced its intent to resume foreclosures in the 23 states which have judicial foreclosures. BOA had suspended foreclosures in those states on Oct. 1 due to revelations of fraud in the processing of foreclosure documents. BOA also announced it would resume foreclosures in a few weeks in the remaining 27 states. This move will likely encourage JP Morgan Chase and GMAC, who had similarly suspended foreclosures in the 23 judicial foreclosure states, to resume taking people’s homes. (New York Times, Oct. 18)

Barbara J. Desoer, president of Bank of America Home Loans, stated, “We did a thorough review of the process and we found the facts underlying the decision to foreclose have been accurate. We paused while we were doing that, and now we’re moving forward.”

While even bourgeois commentators treated this announcement with the cynicism and derision it deserved, Bank of America was emboldened to make this move with the backing of the federal government.

From the onset of the exposure of massive bank fraud, the Obama administration has opposed any calls for a national moratorium on foreclosures. When David Axlerod, President Barack Obama’s chief advisor, appeared on CBS’s “Face the Nation” Oct. 10, he came out against a national moratorium. He was followed by Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan, who published an article Oct. 17 in the Huffington Post that also rejected calls for a national moratorium, saying it would hurt the economy.

Billions for banks

Bank of America noted that the major holders of its mortgages, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, had been consulted during the review and had signed off on the decision to resume foreclosures. Of 14 million mortgages BOA services, one-half of them — worth $2.1 trillion — are owned by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the giant mortgage holding companies controlled by the U.S. Treasury. (NYT, Oct. 18)

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were formerly government-sponsored enterprises, private corporations chartered by the federal government to give them enhanced standing to buy or back up mortgage loans.

However, in July 2008 Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were taken over by the federal government due to massive losses they incurred as a result of the record rise in foreclosures caused by the fraudulent and predatory lending practices of the banks. The federal government placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in trusteeship under the Federal Housing Finance Administration, guaranteeing up to $200 billion in federal tax dollars to back up their loans. That figure was raised to $400 billion, and is now uncapped.

According to a June 3, 2009, statement by FHFA Director James Lockhart, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac own or guarantee 56 percent of single-family mortgages worth $5.4 trillion in the U.S. When combined with the Federal Housing Administration, the federal government backs or issues a whopping 75 percent of the country’s mortgages. (Associated Press, Sept. 9, 2008)

What this means is that when a borrower goes into foreclosure, the bank which made the loan gets paid off at the loan’s full value by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. In addition, the government pays the bank to process the foreclosure. Then the government takes over the home, evicts the homeowner and any tenants, places the home on the market, and sells it at a fraction of the loan’s value.

The difference in what the government paid the bank for the loan, and what the home sells for after foreclosure and eviction, is paid for by taxpayers. That arrangement amounts to a silent bailout of the banks.

For example, a home several doors from where this writer lives in Detroit sold for $137,000 in 2001. The home was then foreclosed and the loan was taken over by Fannie Mae. The home is now being listed by Fannie Mae for $31,000. The $99,000 difference between the $130,000 still owed on the home for which the bank received full value, and the $31,000 for which Fannie Mae is selling the home, is paid for out of taxpayer funds.

This bailout to the banks, which occurs with virtually every foreclosure, has already amounted to $145 billion.

While the FHFA estimated that the total cost of this bailout will be $221 to $363 billion, in 2009 the Congressional Budget Office estimated that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would require $389 billion in federal subsidies through 2019. (Bloomberg News, Oct. 21)

Barclays Capital Inc. analysts put the price tag as high as $500 billion, and Sean Egan, president of Egan-Jones Ratings Co., estimated that the total taxpayer bailout to the banks through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will total $1 trillion. (BN, June 13)

These figures do not include the additional hundreds of millions of dollars in federal subsidies on FHA-backed loans.

Still-soaring foreclosures, no relief for homeowners

The Obama administration has announced modest loan modification programs to help homeowners, such as the Home Affordable Modification Program, in exchange for this continued massive bailout.

HAMP and other programs are supposed to be mandatory for the banks. But the banks do not comply to help homeowners in any significant way. The government relies on the banks themselves to carry out these modifications, and the federal government and most courts have refused to enforce any sanctions for refusal to perform them.

With the banks knowing they will be getting paid full value on the loans after foreclosure, the banks have little incentive to modify loans and have sabotaged HAMP and led to the program’s virtual collapse. As of August less than one-sixth of the 3 million homeowners who were supposed to be helped have received loan modifications, and the number of borrowers being offered trial modifications has drastically declined. (NYT, Aug. 20)

It was recently exposed that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are using the same law firms that prepared the fraudulent documents for the major banks in their processing of foreclosures and evictions. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are sanctioning loan servicers if they do not toss people out of their homes within a short period of time. (NYT, Aug. 22)

Obama: Issue moratorium now!

Today the foreclosure crisis continues to intensify. An estimated 2.8 million foreclosures are projected across the U.S. during 2010, with foreclosures totaling 9 million for the years 2009 to 2012. The total lost home-equity wealth due to foreclosures is expected to be $1.9 trillion for the years 2009 to 2012. (Center for Responsible Lending, Aug. 20)

Foreclosures and evictions are a direct product of persistent high unemployment. Of the 1 million homeowners who received foreclosure counseling through the National Foreclosure Mitigation Counseling Program, 58 percent listed unemployment as the main reason for default. (HousingWire, June 1)

With the federal government controlling or backing the vast majority of mortgage loans, President Obama has the clear authority to implement a two-year moratorium on foreclosures and foreclosure-related evictions through an executive order.

A moratorium would let homeowners and tenants remain in their homes, stabilize communities and allow time to develop a long-term solution to this crisis. Then home loans could be restored to their proper value and housing for all guaranteed.

We must fight each foreclosure and eviction and begin implementing such a moratorium through direct action. During the Depression of the 1930s, move-ins reversed many evictions and led to foreclosure moratoriums being enacted in 25 states, which were upheld as constitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court.

What is needed is for the working class to launch a mass struggle to win this demand. It’s time to fight to reverse the government policies which place the well-being of the financial institutions ahead of the welfare of the people.

Jerry Goldberg is an anti-foreclosure attorney and a leader in the Detroit-based Moratorium NOW! Coalition to Stop Foreclosures, Evictions and Utility Shutoffs. Articles copyright 1995-2010 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

October 25, 2010

Foreclosure Fraud Fall-out

As the most massive, systemic fraud in the history of human commerce continues to unfold before us, there is no lack of topics and issues – while we poke through these cesspools of Wall Street slime. By now, everyone has heard ad nauseum the announcements by U.S. fraud-factories that they were “suspending” foreclosure proceedings “in 23 states”. An automatic question which arises from these announcements is: what about the other 27 states?
We have a situation where Wall Street banks (and the “foreclosure-mills” they hired to do their “dirty work”) didn’t just “cut corners” in processing these foreclosures, they threw the rule-book out the window and willfully committed millions of fraudulent acts – any and every time it was convenient to do so.
Yet despite the severity of the acts of which we already know, most of these fraud-factories are still steaming ahead with getting corrupt judges to rubber-stamp these systemic acts of fraud, in more than half of all U.S. states. This begs another question: what sort of defective legal systems, and defective land-titles systems must these other states have – so that even after this massive fraud is exposed, the bankers are still ramming-through fraudulent foreclosures with impunity?
Bear in mind that unlike countries which maintain honesty and integrity in their legal systems in general, and their land-title registries in particular, virtually none of the millions of foreclosures being rubber-stamped in the U.S. are “final” judgments. Thanks to greedy Wall Street bankers totally abandoning a legal process which was perfected over a period of two centuries (so they could boost profits by a few more percent), permanent defects have been created in (at least) millions of residential properties, and more likely tens of millions – leaving all of these properties open to future legal challenges, indefinitely.
In this respect, my own opinion is conservative. A recent edition of MSNBC’s “Dylan Ratigan Show” provides a more extreme view of this issue. U.S. attorney, Michael Pines: “As bad as you think it is, it’s probably a thousand times worse.”
Pines was responding to a question from Ratigan about Pine’s clients: the Earl family. This middle-class family was trying to get caught up on its mortgage, and making payments to the bank. The Earl’s allege that even after large payments were made on their account (more than $100,000 in total), that there was no change in the balance owing. The moment the Earls requested an “accounting” on their mortgage (which is obviously within their rights), the bank refused to provide an accounting, and simply sent them a “notice of default” (foreclosure) instead.
In other words, if the Earl’s account of the matter is correct, the conduct of the bank did not simply represent “fraud”, but blatant extortion – such as we might literally expect the Mafia to engage in. Give the bank whatever it asks for, with “no questions asked”, or the bank will foreclose on you.
What happened at trial, when the trial judge heard this evidence? Naturally, the trial judge never heard this evidence, because as with 90% of all these fraudulent foreclosures, the judge simply rubber-stamped the bank’s request: giving the bank “legal” permission to take the Earl’s home – without the homeowners ever being permitted to say one word in their own defense.
At this point, many already know the next chapter of the story. The Earl’s (and their nine children) “broke in” to their own house, changed the locks, “repossessed” the house – and are now forced to live as “squatters” because in The Land of Foreclosure Fraud, “justice” is on a long holiday. Attorney Pine’s statement to Ratigan: “This happens all the time.”
Ratigan then introduced a second guest – another bank-victim. This victim alleges that even though a foreclosure process had never been commenced, that one evening someone (representing the bank) broke into her home (while she was there), and attempted to change the locks on her home.
This client’s lawyer, another foreclosure specialist, was equally strident. He simply stated that this massive scandal would “fundamentally destabilize” the entire U.S. real estate market. Pines interjected again.
“This is not only residential, this is commercial.” In that respect, what Pines meant is that we are about to see the same scenario play-out in the multi-trillion dollar U.S. commercial real estate market. At this point he came out with his real “bombshell”: “Nobody in this country knows for sure who owns any real estate.”

By Jeff Nielson

Posted By: Ralph Roberts @ 4:04 pm | | Comments (0) | Trackback |
Filed under: Foreclosure Fraud,Notice of Default,Squatters

October 24, 2010

Obama task force probing banks on foreclosures, criminal charges possible

In the still-developing “mortgagegate” scandal, the Obama White House is pledging its loyalties to the letter of the law, vowing Tuesday to hold “accountable” any bank that engaged in foreclosure fraud.

“As institutions are determining their next steps in addressing these issues, we remain committed to holding accountable any bank that has violated the law,” White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters.

“Mortgagegate,” as it’s been dubbed in the media, centers around the use of unqualified workers given jobs as “mortgage experts,” who were then tasked with signing off on thousands of documents required by courts in foreclosure proceedings.

Many times, paperwork was not properly examined. In some cases, according to sworn statements, bribes of jewelry, cars and even houses were offered if an employee would forge documents or notary seals.

And all of it, according to the allegations, happened in an effort to speed up the foreclosure process.

It was enough for attorneys general in all 50 states to initiate investigations. Only 23 states currently require a court approval before a bank may foreclose on a home.

Now, the Obama administration has directed its Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to find out whether banks that used so called “robo-signers” actively mislead government housing agencies, or if they committed mail or wire fraud by submitting false paperwork.

“The administration’s Federal Housing Administration and Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force have undertaken their own regulatory and enforcement investigation into the foreclosure process,” Gibbs explained Tuesday.

It is possible the investigation will result in criminal charges, The Washington Post noted.

In the wake of the “robo-signing” revelations, several major lenders froze foreclosures temporarily to review paperwork, Bank of America being the largest. The institution said Monday it would be resuming foreclosures this week.

The Obama administration has resisted calls for a national moratorium on foreclosures, with spokesman Robert Gibbs warning of the “unintended consequences” of such an action.

While many House Democrats, including Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), have called for a congressional investigation into foreclosure fraud, Congress is widely expected to attempt legislation retroactively forgiving the mortgage industry for its abuses.

Up to 1.2 million homes are expected to be foreclosed upon this year, according to data provided by RealtyTrac Inc.

By Stephen C. Webster

October 13, 2010

FBI investigates and tips to help prevent you from being victimized

Redemption / Strawman / Bond Fraud

Proponents of this scheme claim that the U.S. government or the Treasury Department control bank accounts—often referred to as “U.S. Treasury Direct Accounts”—for all U.S. citizens that can be accessed by submitting paperwork with state and federal authorities. Individuals promoting this scam frequently cite various discredited legal theories and may refer to the scheme as “Redemption,” “Strawman,” or “Acceptance for Value.” Trainers and websites will often charge large fees for “kits” that teach individuals how to perpetrate this scheme. They will often imply that others have had great success in discharging debt and purchasing merchandise such as cars and homes. Failures to implement the scheme successfully are attributed to individuals not following instructions in a specific order or not filing paperwork at correct times.

This scheme predominately uses fraudulent financial documents that appear to be legitimate. These documents are frequently referred to as “bills of exchange,” “promissory bonds,” “indemnity bonds,” “offset bonds,” “sight drafts,” or “comptrollers warrants.” In addition, other official documents are used outside of their intended purpose, like IRS forms 1099, 1099-OID, and 8300. This scheme frequently intermingles legal and pseudo legal terminology in order to appear lawful. Notaries may be used in an attempt to make the fraud appear legitimate. Often, victims of the scheme are instructed to address their paperwork to the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury.

Tips for Avoiding Redemption/Strawman/Bond Fraud:

* Be wary of individuals or groups selling kits that they claim will inform you on to access secret bank accounts.
* Be wary of individuals or groups proclaiming that paying federal and/or state income tax is not necessary.
* Do not believe that the U.S. Treasury controls bank accounts for all citizens.
* Be skeptical of individuals advocating that speeding tickets, summons, bills, tax notifications, or similar documents can be resolved by writing “acceptance for value” on them.
* If you know of anyone advocating the use of property liens to coerce acceptance of this scheme, contact your local FBI office.

Advance Fee Schemes

An advance fee scheme occurs when the victim pays money to someone in anticipation of receiving something of greater value—such as a loan, contract, investment, or gift—and then receives little or nothing in return.

The variety of advance fee schemes is limited only by the imagination of the con artists who offer them. They may involve the sale of products or services, the offering of investments, lottery winnings, “found money,” or many other “opportunities.” Clever con artists will offer to find financing arrangements for their clients who pay a “finder’s fee” in advance. They require their clients to sign contracts in which they agree to pay the fee when they are introduced to the financing source. Victims often learn that they are ineligible for financing only after they have paid the “finder” according to the contract. Such agreements may be legal unless it can be shown that the “finder” never had the intention or the ability to provide financing for the victims.

Tips for Avoiding Advanced Fee Schemes:

If the offer of an “opportunity” appears too good to be true, it probably is. Follow common business practice. For example, legitimate business is rarely conducted in cash on a street corner.

* Know who you are dealing with. If you have not heard of a person or company that you intend to do business with, learn more about them. Depending on the amount of money that you plan on spending, you may want to visit the business location, check with the Better Business Bureau, or consult with your bank, an attorney, or the police.
* Make sure you fully understand any business agreement that you enter into. If the terms are complex, have them reviewed by a competent attorney.
* Be wary of businesses that operate out of post office boxes or mail drops and do not have a street address. Also be suspicious when dealing with persons who do not have a direct telephone line and who are never in when you call, but always return your call later.
* Be wary of business deals that require you to sign nondisclosure or non-circumvention agreements that are designed to prevent you from independently verifying the bona fides of the people with whom you intend to do business. Con artists often use non-circumvention agreements to threaten their victims with civil suit if they report their losses to law enforcement.

For more information:
- Work-at-Home Advance Fee Scheme
- Cancer Research Advance Fee Scheme

Identity Theft

Identity theft occurs when someone assumes your identity to perform a fraud or other criminal act. Criminals can get the information they need to assume your identity from a variety of sources, including by stealing your wallet, rifling through your trash, or by compromising your credit or bank information. They may approach you in person, by telephone, or on the Internet and ask you for the information.

The sources of information about you are so numerous that you cannot prevent the theft of your identity. But you can minimize your risk of loss by following a few simple hints.

Tips for Avoiding Identity Theft:

* Never throw away ATM receipts, credit statements, credit cards, or bank statements in a usable form.
* Never give your credit card number over the telephone unless you make the call.
* Reconcile your bank account monthly, and notify your bank of discrepancies immediately.
* Keep a list of telephone numbers to call to report the loss or theft of your wallet, credit cards, etc.
* Report unauthorized financial transactions to your bank, credit card company, and the police as soon as you detect them.
* Review a copy of your credit report at least once each year. Notify the credit bureau in writing of any questionable entries and follow through until they are explained or removed.
* If your identity has been assumed, ask the credit bureau to print a statement to that effect in your credit report.
* If you know of anyone who receives mail from credit card companies or banks in the names of others, report it to local or federal law enforcement authorities.

Investment-Related Scams

Letter of Credit Fraud

Legitimate letters of credit are never sold or offered as investments. They are issued by banks to ensure payment for goods shipped in connection with international trade. Payment on a letter of credit generally requires that the paying bank receive documentation certifying that the goods ordered have been shipped and are en route to their intended destination. Letters of credit frauds are often attempted against banks by providing false documentation to show that goods were shipped when, in fact, no goods or inferior goods were shipped.

Other letter of credit frauds occur when con artists offer a “letter of credit” or “bank guarantee” as an investment wherein the investor is promised huge interest rates on the order of 100 to 300 percent annually. Such investment “opportunities” simply do not exist. (See Prime Bank Notes for additional information.)

Tips for Avoiding Letter of Credit Fraud:

* If an “opportunity” appears too good to be true, it probably is.
* Do not invest in anything unless you understand the deal. Con artists rely on complex transactions and faulty logic to “explain” fraudulent investment schemes.
* Do not invest or attempt to “purchase” a “letter of credit.” Such investments simply do not exist.
* Be wary of any investment that offers the promise of extremely high yields.
* Independently verify the terms of any investment that you intend to make, including the parties involved and the nature of the investment.

Prime Bank Note Fraud

International fraud artists have invented an investment scheme that supposedly offers extremely high yields in a relatively short period of time. In this scheme, they claim to have access to “bank guarantees” that they can buy at a discount and sell at a premium. By reselling the “bank guarantees” several times, they claim to be able to produce exceptional returns on investment. For example, if $10 million worth of “bank guarantees” can be sold at a two percent profit on 10 separate occasions—or “traunches”—the seller would receive a 20 percent profit. Such a scheme is often referred to as a “roll program.”

To make their schemes more enticing, con artists often refer to the “guarantees” as being issued by the world’s “prime banks,” hence the term “prime bank guarantees.” Other official sounding terms are also used, such as “prime bank notes” and “prime bank debentures.” Legal documents associated with such schemes often require the victim to enter into non-disclosure and non-circumvention agreements, offer returns on investment in “a year and a day”, and claim to use forms required by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). In fact, the ICC has issued a warning to all potential investors that no such investments exist.

The purpose of these frauds is generally to encourage the victim to send money to a foreign bank, where it is eventually transferred to an off-shore account in the control of the con artist. From there, the victim’s money is used for the perpetrator’s personal expenses or is laundered in an effort to make it disappear.

While foreign banks use instruments called “bank guarantees” in the same manner that U.S. banks use letters of credit to insure payment for goods in international trade, such bank guarantees are never traded or sold on any kind of market.

Tips for Avoiding Prime Bank Note Fraud:

* Think before you invest in anything. Be wary of an investment in any scheme, referred to as a “roll program,” that offers unusually high yields by buying and selling anything issued by “prime banks.”
* As with any investment, perform due diligence. Independently verify the identity of the people involved, the veracity of the deal, and the existence of the security in which you plan to invest.
* Be wary of business deals that require non-disclosure or non-circumvention agreements that are designed to prevent you from independently verifying information about the investment.

“Ponzi’ Schemes

“Ponzi” schemes promise high financial returns or dividends not available through traditional investments. Instead of investing the funds of victims, however, the con artist pays “dividends” to initial investors using the funds of subsequent investors. The scheme generally falls apart when the operator flees with all of the proceeds or when a sufficient number of new investors cannot be found to allow the continued payment of “dividends.”

This type of fraud is named after its creator—Charles Ponzi of Boston, Massachusetts. In the early 1900s, Ponzi launched a scheme that guaranteed investors a 50 percent return on their investment in postal coupons. Although he was able to pay his initial backers, the scheme dissolved when he was unable to pay later investors.

Tips for Avoiding Ponzi Schemes:

* Be careful of any investment opportunity that makes exaggerated earnings claims.
* Exercise due diligence in selecting investments and the people with whom you invest—in other words, do your homework.
* Consult an unbiased third party—like an unconnected broker or licensed financial advisor—before investing.

For more information:
- Bernie Madoff Case
- Stanford Case
- Wholesale Grocery Distribution Ponzi Scheme
- ATM Ponzi Scheme
- Victims Turn Tables with Ponzi Scheme

Pyramid Schemes

As in Ponzi schemes, the money collected from newer victims of the fraud is paid to earlier victims to provide a veneer of legitimacy. In pyramid schemes, however, the victims themselves are induced to recruit further victims through the payment of recruitment commissions.

More specifically, pyramid schemes—also referred to as franchise fraud or chain referral schemes—are marketing and investment frauds in which an individual is offered a distributorship or franchise to market a particular product. The real profit is earned, not by the sale of the product, but by the sale of new distributorships. Emphasis on selling franchises rather than the product eventually leads to a point where the supply of potential investors is exhausted and the pyramid collapses. At the heart of each pyramid scheme is typically a representation that new participants can recoup their original investments by inducing two or more prospects to make the same investment. Promoters fail to tell prospective participants that this is mathematically impossible for everyone to do, since some participants drop out, while others recoup their original investments and then drop out.

Tips for Avoiding Pyramid Schemes:

* Be wary of “opportunities” to invest your money in franchises or investments that require you to bring in subsequent investors to increase your profit or recoup your initial investment.
* Independently verify the legitimacy of any franchise or investment before you invest.

Market Manipulation or “Pump and Dump” Fraud

This scheme—commonly referred to as a “pump and dump”—creates artificial buying pressure for a targeted security, generally a low-trading volume issuer in the over-the-counter securities market largely controlled by the fraud perpetrators. This artificially increased trading volume has the effect of artificially increasing the price of the targeted security (i.e., the “pump”), which is rapidly sold off into the inflated market for the security by the fraud perpetrators (i.e., the “dump”); resulting in illicit gains to the perpetrators and losses to innocent third party investors. Typically, the increased trading volume is generated by inducing unwitting investors to purchase shares of the targeted security through false or deceptive sales practices and/or public information releases.

A modern variation on this scheme involves largely foreign-based computer criminals gaining unauthorized access to the online brokerage accounts of unsuspecting victims in the United States. These victim accounts are then utilized to engage in coordinated online purchases of the targeted security to affect the pump portion of a manipulation, while the fraud perpetrators sell their pre-existing holdings in the targeted security into the inflated market to complete the dump.

Tips for Avoiding Market Manipulation Fraud:

* Don’t believe the hype.
* Find out where the stock trades.
* Independently verify claims.
* Research the opportunity.
* Beware of high-pressure pitches.
* Always be skeptical.

For more information:
- Operation Shore Shells investigation

Telemarketing Fraud

When you send money to people you do not know personally or give personal or financial information to unknown callers, you increase your chances of becoming a victim of telemarketing fraud.

Here are some warning signs of telemarketing fraud—what a caller may tell you:

* “You must act ‘now’ or the offer won’t be good.”
* “You’ve won a ‘free’ gift, vacation, or prize.” But you have to pay for “postage and handling” or other charges.
* “You must send money, give a credit card or bank account number, or have a check picked up by courier.” You may hear this before you have had a chance to consider the offer carefully.
* “You don’t need to check out the company with anyone.” The callers say you do not need to speak to anyone including your family, lawyer, accountant, local Better Business Bureau, or consumer protection agency.
* “You don’t need any written information about their company or their references.”
* “You can’t afford to miss this ‘high-profit, no-risk’ offer.”

If you hear these or similar “lines” from a telephone salesperson, just say “no thank you” and hang up the telephone.

Tips for Avoiding Telemarketing Fraud:

It’s very difficult to get your money back if you’ve been cheated over the telephone. Before you buy anything by telephone, remember:

* Don’t buy from an unfamiliar company. Legitimate businesses understand that you want more information about their company and are happy to comply.
* Always ask for and wait until you receive written material about any offer or charity. If you get brochures about costly investments, ask someone whose financial advice you trust to review them. But, unfortunately, beware—not everything written down is true.
* Always check out unfamiliar companies with your local consumer protection agency, Better Business Bureau, state attorney general, the National Fraud Information Center, or other watchdog groups. Unfortunately, not all bad businesses can be identified through these organizations.
* Obtain a salesperson’s name, business identity, telephone number, street address, mailing address, and business license number before you transact business. Some con artists give out false names, telephone numbers, addresses, and business license numbers. Verify the accuracy of these items.
* Before you give money to a charity or make an investment, find out what percentage of the money is paid in commissions and what percentage actually goes to the charity or investment.
* Before you send money, ask yourself a simple question. “What guarantee do I really have that this solicitor will use my money in the manner we agreed upon?”
* Don’t pay in advance for services. Pay services only after they are delivered.
* Be wary of companies that want to send a messenger to your home to pick up money, claiming it is part of their service to you. In reality, they are taking your money without leaving any trace of who they are or where they can be reached.
* Always take your time making a decision. Legitimate companies won’t pressure you to make a snap decision.
* Don’t pay for a “free prize.” If a caller tells you the payment is for taxes, he or she is violating federal law.
* Before you receive your next sales pitch, decide what your limits are—the kinds of financial information you will and won’t give out on the telephone.
* Be sure to talk over big investments offered by telephone salespeople with a trusted friend, family member, or financial advisor. It’s never rude to wait and think about an offer.
* Never respond to an offer you don’t understand thoroughly.
* Never send money or give out personal information such as credit card numbers and expiration dates, bank account numbers, dates of birth, or social security numbers to unfamiliar companies or unknown persons.
* Be aware that your personal information is often brokered to telemarketers through third parties.
* If you have been victimized once, be wary of persons who call offering to help you recover your losses for a fee paid in advance.
* If you have information about a fraud, report it to state, local, or federal law enforcement agencies.

For More information:
- Telemarketing Fraud Targeting Seniors

Nigerian Letter or “419” Fraud

Nigerian letter frauds combine the threat of impersonation fraud with a variation of an advance fee scheme in which a letter mailed from Nigeria offers the recipient the “opportunity” to share in a percentage of millions of dollars that the author—a self-proclaimed government official—is trying to transfer illegally out of Nigeria. The recipient is encouraged to send information to the author, such as blank letterhead stationery, bank name and account numbers, and other identifying information using a fax number provided in the letter. Some of these letters have also been received via e-mail through the Internet. The scheme relies on convincing a willing victim, who has demonstrated a “propensity for larceny” by responding to the invitation, to send money to the author of the letter in Nigeria in several installments of increasing amounts for a variety of reasons.

Payment of taxes, bribes to government officials, and legal fees are often described in great detail with the promise that all expenses will be reimbursed as soon as the funds are spirited out of Nigeria. In actuality, the millions of dollars do not exist, and the victim eventually ends up with nothing but loss. Once the victim stops sending money, the perpetrators have been known to use the personal information and checks that they received to impersonate the victim, draining bank accounts and credit card balances. While such an invitation impresses most law-abiding citizens as a laughable hoax, millions of dollars in losses are caused by these schemes annually. Some victims have been lured to Nigeria, where they have been imprisoned against their will along with losing large sums of money. The Nigerian government is not sympathetic to victims of these schemes, since the victim actually conspires to remove funds from Nigeria in a manner that is contrary to Nigerian law. The schemes themselves violate section 419 of the Nigerian criminal code, hence the label “419 fraud.”

Tips for Avoiding Nigerian Letter or “419″ Fraud:

* If you receive a letter from Nigeria asking you to send personal or banking information, do not reply in any manner. Send the letter to the U.S. Secret Service, your local FBI office, or the U.S. Postal Inspection Service. You can also register a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission’s Complaint Assistant.
* If you know someone who is corresponding in one of these schemes, encourage that person to contact the FBI or the U.S. Secret Service as soon as possible.
* Be skeptical of individuals representing themselves as Nigerian or foreign government officials asking for your help in placing large sums of money in overseas bank accounts.
* Do not believe the promise of large sums of money for your cooperation.
* Guard your account information carefully.

For More information:
- Related Online Rental Ads Scheme
- Related Spanish Lottery Scam

Health Care Fraud or Health Insurance Fraud

Medical Equipment Fraud:

Equipment manufacturers offer “free” products to individuals. Insurers are then charged for products that were not needed and/or may not have been delivered.

“Rolling Lab” Schemes:

Unnecessary and sometimes fake tests are given to individuals at health clubs, retirement homes, or shopping malls and billed to insurance companies or Medicare.

Services Not Performed:

Customers or providers bill insurers for services never rendered by changing bills or submitting fake ones.

Medicare Fraud:

Medicare fraud can take the form of any of the health insurance frauds described above. Senior citizens are frequent targets of Medicare schemes, especially by medical equipment manufacturers who offer seniors free medical products in exchange for their Medicare numbers. Because a physician has to sign a form certifying that equipment or testing is needed before Medicare pays for it, con artists fake signatures or bribe corrupt doctors to sign the forms. Once a signature is in place, the manufacturers bill Medicare for merchandise or service that was not needed or was not ordered.

Tips for Avoiding Health Care Fraud or Health Insurance Fraud:

* Never sign blank insurance claim forms.
* Never give blanket authorization to a medical provider to bill for services rendered.
* Ask your medical providers what they will charge and what you will be expected to pay out-of-pocket.
* Carefully review your insurer’s explanation of the benefits statement. Call your insurer and provider if you have questions.
* Do not do business with door-to-door or telephone salespeople who tell you that services of medical equipment are free.
* Give your insurance/Medicare identification only to those who have provided you with medical services.
* Keep accurate records of all health care appointments.
* Know if your physician ordered equipment for you.

For more information:
- Heath Care Fraud webpage

October 11, 2010

FBI: Top Areas for Mortgage Fraud

* Analysis of available law enforcement and industry resources indicates that the top ten mortgage fraud areas are California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Texas, and Utah. Other areas significantly affected by mortgage fraud include Arizona, Colorado, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia.
* There is a strong correlation between mortgage fraud and loans which result in default and foreclosure.

Emerging Schemes

* Recent statistics suggest that escalating foreclosures provide criminals with the opportunity to exploit and defraud vulnerable homeowners seeking financial guidance.
* Perpetrators are exploiting the home equity line of credit (HELOC) application process to conduct mortgage fraud, check fraud, and potentially money laundering-related activity.

FBI and Industry Respond to Escalating Mortgage Fraud

* The FBI is proactively working with the mortgage industry in an effort to curb mortgage fraud crimes. The FBI signed a memorandum of agreement with the MBA to promote the FBI’s Mortgage Fraud Warning Notice.

Introduction

The Prieston Group, a risk management solutions provider that administers an insurance product covering losses due to fraud and misrepresentation, calculated that losses attributed to mortgage fraud will most likely reach $4.2 billion for 2006. This figure does not take into account another estimated $1.2 billion spent on fraud prevention tools. – The Prieston Group, 2006 Data, 16 February 2007,and 2 April 2007.

Mortgage Fraud is defined as the intentional misstatement, misrepresentation, or omission by an applicant or other interested parties, relied on by a lender or underwriter to provide funding for, to purchase, or to insure a mortgage loan. Although no central repository collects all mortgage fraud complaints, statistics from multiple sources indicate that mortgage fraud is on the rise. Some industry explanations for this increase point to recent high mortgage loan origination volumes that strained quality control efforts, the persistent desire of mortgage lenders to hasten the mortgage loan process, the escalation of home prices in recent years, and the introduction of non-traditional loans which contain fewer quality control restraints such as low documentation and no documentation loans1.

Mortgage loan fraud is divided into two categories: fraud for property and fraud for profit. Fraud for property/housing entails minor misrepresentations by the applicant solely for the purpose of purchasing a property for a primary residence. This scheme usually involves a single loan. Although applicants may embellish income and conceal debt, their intent is to repay the loan. Fraud for profit, however, often involves multiple loans and elaborate schemes perpetrated to gain illicit proceeds from property sales. It is this second category that is of most concern to law enforcement and the mortgage industry. Gross misrepresentations concerning appraisals and loan documents are common in fraud for profit schemes and participants are frequently paid for their participation. Recent events likely resulted in an increase in mortgage fraud as higher housing prices tempted borrowers to commit fraud for property in order to qualify for a mortgage loan. Also, mortgage fraud perpetrators likely seized the opportunity to take advantage of the relaxed lending practices to commit fraud for profit.

The most common form of mortgage fraud is illegal property flipping which entails false appraisals and other fraudulent loan documents (see figure 1). Combating mortgage fraud effectively requires the cooperation of law enforcement and industry entities. No single regulatory agency is charged with monitoring this crime. The FBI, Department of Housing and Urban Development-Office of Inspector General (HUD-OIG), Internal Revenue Service, Postal Inspection Service, and state and local agencies are among those investigating mortgage fraud.

Mortgage fraud is a relatively low-risk, high-yield criminal activity that tempts many. However, according a May 2006 Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) report, finance-related occupations, including accountants, mortgage brokers, and lenders, were the most common suspect occupations associated with reported mortgage fraud2. Perpetrators in these occupations are familiar with the mortgage loan process and therefore know how to exploit vulnerabilities in the system.

Victims of mortgage fraud may include borrowers, mortgage industry entities, and those living in the neighborhoods affected by mortgage fraud. Lenders are plagued with high foreclosure costs, broker commissions, reappraisals, attorney fees, rehabilitation costs, and other related expenses when a mortgage fraud is committed3. As properties affected by mortgage fraud are sold at artificially inflated prices, properties in surrounding neighborhoods also become artificially inflated. When property values increase, property taxes increase as well. Legitimate homeowners also find it difficult to sell their homes as surrounding properties affected by fraud deteriorate.

During boom periods, high mortgage loan volume impacts expedited quality control efforts which often focus on production. Therefore, perpetrators may submit loans based on fraudulent information anticipating that the bogus information will be overlooked. On the other hand, loan officers, brokers, and others in the industry are paid by commission and may be tempted to approve questionable loans when the housing market is down to maintain current levels of income.

Analysis of mortgage originations indicates a decrease in demand. As a result of the declining housing market, mortgage fraud perpetrators may take advantage of eager loan originators attempting to generate loans for commission. Mortgage loan originations, including purchases and refinances declined during 2006 across the United States. The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) estimates that mortgage loan originations will reach $2.28 trillion during 2007 (see figure 2)4. According to an MBA December 2006 report, total home sales during 2006 decreased by approximately 10 percent from 2005 sales. New home sales declined by 17 percent and existing home sales dipped by 8 percent. In response to a decrease in demand for housing, builders reduced single-family starts (through November 2006) which were 14 percent lower than during the same time period in 2005. The MBA estimates that the oversupply of housing will continue to affect new home construction, home sales, and home prices until mid-20075.

Top Areas for Mortgage Fraud

Data was compiled and analyzed from law enforcement and industry sources to determine those areas of the country most affected by mortgage fraud during 2006. Information from the FBI, HUD-OIG, FinCEN, Mortgage Asset Research Institute (MARI), Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), RealtyTrac Inc. (foreclosure statistics), and Radian Guaranty Inc., indicate that the top ten mortgage fraud areas for 2006 were California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Texas, and Utah. Other areas significantly affected by mortgage fraud include Arizona, Colorado, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia (see figure 3).

Analysis of available information indicates that mortgage fraud is most concentrated in the north central region of the United States. The north central region is followed by the southeast and west regions.

Regional analysis of FBI pending mortgage fraud-related investigations as of FY 2006 reveals that the north central region of the United States led the nation with the most pending investigations. The north central region was followed by the southeast, west, south central, and northeast, respectively (see figure 4).

The aggregate amount of ARM loans containing fraudulent misrepresentations is unknown. However, since mortgage fraud perpetrators hope to inflate the value of their properties and quickly sell them, they would likely gravitate towards mortgage loans that offered low and short-term interest rates such as those offered by ARMs.

Delinquency, Default, and Foreclosure: Potential Fraud Indicators

Mortgage loans based on fraudulent information usually result in delinquency, default, or foreclosure in a bear market. According to the MBA, both delinquency and foreclosures rates increased during 2006 and were largely concentrated in adjustable rate mortgage (ARM) loans, especially sub-prime ARMs. This is partly attributable to the recent rise in interest rates, placing a strain on ARMs borrowers6.

BasePoint Analytics, a fraud analytics company, analyzed more than 3 million loans and found that between 30 and 70 percent of early payment defaults (EPDs) are linked to significant misrepresentations in the original loan applications7. Radian Guaranty, Inc. is a leading provider of mortgage insurance which protects lenders against loan default. Of the top ten states Radian Guaranty Inc. ranked highest for mortgage fraud, seven of them also ranked in the company’s top ten for EPDs. This suggests that EPDs are a good mortgage fraud indicator.

During 2006 there were more than 1.2 million foreclosure filings nationally, which represents a 42 percent increase from 2005 figures. The foreclosure rate for 2006 was one foreclosure filing for every 92 households8. Foreclosures for 2006 surpassed foreclosures for 2005 during every month of the year9.

Foreclosure Fraud

Recent statistics suggest that escalating foreclosures provide criminals with the opportunity to exploit and defraud vulnerable homeowners seeking financial guidance. The perpetrators convince homeowners that they can save their homes from foreclosure through deed transfers and the payment of up-front fees. This “foreclosure rescue” often involves a manipulated deed process that results in the preparation of forged deeds. In extreme instances, perpetrators may sell the home or secure a second loan without the homeowners’ knowledge, stripping the property’s equity for personal enrichment.

While foreclosure scams vary, they may be used in combination with other fraudulent schemes. For instance, perpetrators may view foreclosure-rescue scams as a new method for fraudulently acquiring properties to facilitate illegal property-flipping and equity-skimming.

Home Equity Lines of Credit

According to a DOJ press release, Mi Su Yi and her husband, Paul Amorello, were sentenced in California in July 2006 for operating a $3 million bust-out scheme involving business lines of credit and HELOCs. The couple accessed lines of credit that had been obtained by others and paid the balances with worthless checks. They subsequently withdrew cash from the lines of credit before the checks were returned for insufficient funds. The couple laundered their proceeds through bank accounts opened under three false identities. In an attempt to avoid detection, the couple deposited cash amounts of less than $10,000 into these accounts. -US DOJ, “New Jersey Residents Sentenced to Prison for Running a $3 Million ‘Bust-Out’ Scheme,” Press Release, 25 July 2006, available at http://www.usdoj.gov

Individuals and criminal groups are exploiting the home equity line of credit (HELOC) application process to conduct multiple-funding mortgage fraud schemes, check fraud schemes, and potentially money laundering-related activity. HELOCs differ from standard home equity loans because the homeowner may borrow against the line of credit over a period of time using a checkbook or credit card. HELOCs are aggressively marketed by lenders as an easy, fast, and inexpensive means to obtain funds. HELOC funds are normally withdrawn on an as-needed basis to conduct home repairs or to pay bills, but fraud perpetrators may withdraw the entire amount within a short time period. Lenders typically focus on property equity prior to funding HELOCs. As such, many lenders do not demand a full property appraisal or a full property title search.

Perpetrators apply for multiple HELOCs to different lending institutions for a single property within a short time period. Prior to providing the funding, lenders conduct searches to determine if the property is encumbered by a lien. However, liens on a property may not be recorded for several days or months and thus cannot be immediately verified. Consequently, lenders do not discover that they hold a third, fourth, or fifth lien on a property (rather than the expected second lien) until later. The money obtained from the multiple HELOCs totals more than the original property purchase price, exceeding the out-of-pocket expenses incurred to secure the property.

Perpetrators conducting check fraud schemes may manipulate HELOC accounts and cause lenders to incur losses. For example, a perpetrator secures a HELOC and withdraws the entire allotted amount. A fraudulent check is then used to pay the balance owed on the HELOC. However, the perpetrator quickly withdraws the check amount from the HELOC before the bank realizes the check is worthless. When the check is returned for insufficient funds, the line of credit surpasses its maximum limit and the lender experiences a loss. HELOC accounts have also been used in common check frauds where perpetrators stole HELOC checks, fraudulently completed them, and deposited the funds into their own personal accounts.

HELOCs may also be used as a means of depositing and withdrawing laundered proceeds to further conceal the original funding source. As long as withdrawals from the HELOC do not exceed the line of credit limit, payments deposited into the account may be withdrawn later.

FBI and Industry Respond to Escalating Mortgage Fraud

The FBI is proactively working with the mortgage industry in an effort to curb mortgage fraud crimes. On March 8, 2007, the FBI signed a memorandum of agreement with the MBA to promote the FBI’s Mortgage Fraud Warning Notice. The Notice states that it is illegal to make any false statement regarding income, assets, debt or matters of identification, or to willfully inflate property value to influence the action of a financial institution. Under the agreement, the MBA and the FBI will make the notice available to mortgage lenders to use voluntarily as a means of educating consumers and mortgage professionals of the penalties and consequences of mortgage fraud.10

October 9, 2010

Who Are the Winners and Losers in the Foreclosure Fraud Crisis?

The unfolding foreclosure fraud crisis isn’t easy to understand, but here it is boiled down. Banks need proper documentation to repossess a home from a family. They need documents about everything from the family’s financial situation to its history of missed payments to its assets. And they need to verify that the information in those documents is correct. But they didn’t. They hired individuals to sign thousands of mortgage papers — legal affidavits, swearing to a judge that they had personal knowledge of the information within — without checking a thing.

Only 23 states require a judge to sign off on a foreclosure, but some banks are now stopping foreclosures in all 50 states. Moreover, they are halting the sale of foreclosed properties to new homeowners.

So who stands to gain? And who stands to lose? Let’s go through the possible impacts on major players and markets, one by one.

The winners:

* Homeowners undergoing foreclosure. Borrowers undergoing foreclosure might benefit from the various state moratoriums: The process is stalled for now, meaning some might have a few more months in their homes, and they know they will not be evicted without due process. States and federal agencies might also work with banks to provide principal write-downs and right-to-rent to ameliorate the foreclosure crisis in the meantime.

The losers:

* Recent purchasers of foreclosed homes. A nightmare scenario: Banks probably foreclosed on and evicted families without proper mortgage documentation. It is unclear whether or how courts might overturn those foreclosures. (One expert I spoke with said it would be more likely that the bank would have to offer some sort of restitution to the evicted family, but nobody really knows.) What if you recently bought one of those houses? There’s a whole lot of uncertainty for you, right now.
* The housing market. The fraud crisis looks certain to prolong the foreclosure crisis — dragging out how long families undergoing foreclosure will remain in limbo, and preventing banks from clearing properties off of their books. It seems possible that the foreclosure fraud crisis will weaken an already-weak housing market.
* The banks and investors. This could be a complete catastrophe. For a detailed but clear explanation of the various liabilities, see Mike Konczal’s description of who owns what and who stands to lose — and an explanation of why this might create a new too-big-to-fail scenario. Rep. Brad Miller (D-N.C.) also provided a clear explanation to The Washington Post yesterday:

There is massive potential liability for the securitizers, which are mostly the biggest banks. The contract was that if mortgages didn’t meet certain requirements, then the securitizer would buy them back. The mortgage servicers and trustees have exclusive control over the paperwork. Both the investors, the people who own the mortgage-backed securities, and the homeowners, really depend on them. There’s been lots of litigation where investors try to get securitizers to buy back the bad mortgages because they were flawed, but that litigation has been stymied by procedural objections. If the private investors can break through that defense and require the mortgages that don’t meet the requirements to be bought back, the liabilities for the biggest banks will be enormous.

A little of each:

* Communities with concentrations of homes in foreclosure. Good news and bad news. On the one hand, families should be able to stay in their homes until the banks and Washington work out the foreclosure fraud crisis. That will benefit communities with lots of families undergoing foreclosure. On the other hand, neighborhoods with high concentrations of bank-owned properties for sale will see a lot of homes remain vacant, pulled off of the market.
* The courts. State attorney generals — Beau Biden in Delaware, Richard Cordray in Ohio, Tom Miller in Iowa and many others — are going hard after the banks. This looks to be just the first wave of what might be thousands of cases for judges to handle. Many housing advocates argue that judges should have had a more prominent role in foreclosure decisions before, anyway — and this might give new life to cramdown legislation in Washington. But the scandal certainly has the potential to swamp courts and cost billions in legal fees. In that sense, lawyers might be the clearest winner from the whole thing thus far.

By Annie Lowrey

October 8, 2010

Foreclosure Fraud Scandal Heats Up

Soon, I’ll be up with a piece looking more closely at the foreclosure fraud scandal engulfing the country. But for those not following carefully, here’s a recap.

Last month, Ally Financial, formerly known as GMAC, suspended evictions in 23 states after revealing that employees had submitted faulty affidavits when foreclosing on some unknown number of homes. In those 23 states, the bank needs a judge’s approval to foreclose, and submits affidavits to get it. (Affidavits are sworn statements, so false ones constitute perjury or fraud.) This month, Bank of America and J.P. Morgan Chase also suspended evictions in these states after revelations about robo-signers — employees rubber-stamping thousands of foreclosure documents, without checking the information — and false evictions came to light.

Now, state governments are enacting moratoriums and politicians are castigating banks for failing to follow through on their legal work, forcing families out of their homes without following due process. This week, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and other Democrats wrote Attorney General Eric Holder, requesting that the Justice Department investigate the systemic problems.

The scandal has made clear that paperwork in the housing bust has proven just as shoddy as during the housing boom. The banks are just acting illegally. Check out this video of a woman who thought a burglar was breaking into her house. It was the bank, coming to change the locks. Even though she still lived there.

October 7, 2010

NATIONAL MORTGAGE FRAUD SWEEP TAKES IN TWO BIRMINGHAM FRAUD RINGS

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Alabama is currently prosecuting two mortgage fraud rings that have affected 125 properties in the Birmingham Metro Area and caused nearly $4 million in losses to banks and lending institutions, U.S. Attorney Joyce White Vance announced.

Working as part of Operation Stolen Dreams, the national mortgage fraud crackdown announced today by Attorney General Eric Holder, Vance said 12 defendants in the two Jefferson County mortgage fraud rings have been charged, sentenced or pleaded guilty since March 1 when the national sweep began.

Operation Stolen Dreams was organized by President Obama’s interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, which was established to lead an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. Nationwide, since the sweep began it has involved 1,215 criminal defendants, including 485 arrests, who are allegedly responsible for more than $2.3 billion in losses. Additionally, the operation has, to date, resulted in 191 civil enforcement actions which have resulted in the recovery of more than $147 million.

“Mortgage fraud not only damages our banks and credit unions, this crime can affect the very core of our neighborhoods and communities,” Vance said. “We have seen first-hand that as a property goes into foreclosure, surrounding homes are harmed by lowered property values. Many times the foreclosed properties become abandoned, and these vacant houses then become the source of new criminal offenses such as vandalism, or drug-related activities. We are determined to aggressively seek out these frauds and prosecute their perpetrators,” she said.

The mortgage fraud rings currently being prosecuted in Birmingham involve various schemes of deception. Some schemes involve false statements of income and assets on loan applications. In other schemes, the seller makes an up-front payment to the buyer of rental property and promises to supply tenants eligible for government rent subsidies. Then, when the properties can’t be rented, buyers are stuck with depressed properties they can’t afford.

Of the 12 defendants involved in the two rings, 8face pending charges, two have been convicted and sentenced, and two have pleaded guilty and are awaiting sentencing.

The FBI, the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Office of Inspector General and the Social Security Administration’s Office of Inspector General investigated these mortgage fraud rings and worked with Assistant U.S. Attorney Patrick Carney to bring them to prosecution, Vance said.

“Those who perpetrate mortgage fraud not only damage lending institutions, real estate professionals and the financial health of our communities – they also victimize a significant number of homeowners in the U.S. every year,” said FBI Special Agent in Charge Patrick J. Maley. “As these cases highlight, the FBI, along with our local, state and federal partners, are addressing this crime on a local level to protect the financial health of our country as well as individual citizens,” Maley said.

“The last number of years have seen enormous and damaging developments in the mortgage and housing markets, with an urgent reliance on the government to bolster unstable marketplaces and devastated communities,” said Kenneth M. Donohue, inspector general of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. “The HUD OIG, in partnership with other federal agencies, is deeply committed to ensuring that scarce resources are not diverted to those who seek to enrich themselves at the expense of those who so desperately need assistance today.”

The local mortgage fraud ring led by TIMOTHY JOHNSON hit lenders the hardest, causing $2.5 million in failed mortgages on about 45 properties in Fairfield, East Lake, inner-city Birmingham and Bessemer. Loans have been foreclosed on about 75 percent of those homes. Johnson and nine other individuals have been charged in connection with this mortgage fraud ring.

Johnson, 45, of Bessemer, is charged with two counts of making false statements on a loan application, two counts of mail fraud against a financial institution and one count of false statements to federal agents. The nine other defendants connected to the case all face charges that they supplied false information or documents, including letters claiming Social Security disability payments, in their mortgage loan applications.

Johnson, as the center of the fraud, would approach people attempting to sell their homes and discover what price they wanted. He would do minimal work on the homes, have them appraised and then attach a “mechanics lien” against the property for the difference between the appraised value and what the owner wanted for the house. Johnson would then proceed to find buyers, spreading the word that he could help individuals improve their credit or get approved for a mortgage loan.

His means of helping people secure loans often involved the creation of fraudulent letters purporting to show that the loan applicant received monthly disability payments from the Social Security Administration. Once loans were issued, based on the false claims of disability income or false credit claims, Johnson would realize his profit from the scheme. He would be paid the amount of the liens he placed on the properties.

Among the nine other defendants charged in connection to Johnson’s fraud scheme was a Social Security Administration employee, Pamela Terrell. Terrell was charged with aiding and abetting the fraud. She provided Johnson with several disability award letters that fraudulently purported to be from the Social Security Administration, and which were used to obtain loans for otherwise ineligible loan applicants.

A second ring being prosecuted in this office was led by AL CARSON ROCKETT, 33, of Birmingham, who pleaded guilty in February to mail fraud. Those charges were connected to a mortgage fraud scheme that involved about 80 properties and totaled $1,090,046. Rockett was sentenced June 3 to 15 months in prison.

Rocketts’ frauds took various forms as he adapted to changing banking and funding rules associated with mortgage loans. His initial scheme involved altering documents to make it appear that the home buyer already owned the home and was seeking to refinance the mortgage. He was assisted in this scheme by JERRY EUGENE PARKER, who owned Central Alabama Title Company. Parker, 59, of Hoover, was charged in April with two counts of aiding and abetting mail fraud.

Rockett resold houses he bought at foreclosure auctions. He made minimal improvements on the houses, then obtained artificially high appraisals. He recruited buyers with assurances that the houses could be investments, promising to find tenants through the government’s subsidized rent program and claiming the rent would cover the mortgage and provide some profit. Tenants rarely were found.

Once Rockett had buyers, Parker would change the title of the property into the buyer’s name before the sale was made. This allowed the new buyer to appear as the current owner of the property seeking a refinance, rather than a new mortgage loan. The loan requested would be 20 percent less than the appraised value, giving the appearance that the owner had at least 20 percent equity in the home, and making the loan more likely to be approved.

Rockett made his illicit profit in the difference between the inflated loan amount and his original purchase price. This refinance scheme also allowed him to avoid down-payment or other costs associated with an original mortgage loan.

The President’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general, and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes. For more information on the task force, visit StopFraud.gov.

June 29, 2010

Feds conclude biggest mortgage fraud dragnet in U.S. history

Suspects may find themselves behind bars living rent free thanks to nationwide mortgage fraud arrests.

Members of the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force released the results of a nationwide dragnet, “Operation Stolen Dreams,” which targeted mortgage fraudsters throughout the country and is the largest collective enforcement effort ever brought to bear in confronting mortgage fraud. The White Collar Crime Committee of the National Association of Chiefs of Police obtained relevant documents describing this enormous operation.

The sweep was organized by President Barack Obama’s interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, which was established “to lead an aggressive, coordinated, and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes.”

Starting on March 1 through June 17, Operation Stolen Dreams has involved 1,215 criminal defendants nationwide, including 485 arrests, who are allegedly responsible for more than $2.3 billion in losses. Additionally, to date the operation has resulted in 191 civil enforcement actions, which have resulted in the recovery of more than $147 million, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

“From home buyers to lenders, mortgage fraud has had a resounding impact on the nation’s economy,” said FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, III. “Those who prey on the housing market should know that hundreds of FBI agents on task forces and their law enforcement partners are tracking down your schemes and you will be brought to justice.”

Unlike previous mortgage fraud sweeps, Operation Stolen Dreams focused not only on federal criminal cases, but also on civil enforcement, recovering money for victims and increasing cooperation with state and local partners.

The operation was conducted in conjunction with the Department of Justice — including the FBI, U.S. Attorneys Offices, the U.S. Trustee Program, and other components — as well as the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Department of the Treasury, the Federal Trade Commission, the Internal Revenue Service, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, the U.S. Secret Service, the National Association of Attorneys General, and the National District Attorneys Association.

The President’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general, and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources, according to officials.

MORTGAGE FRAUD REPORT

According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s 2009 Mortgage Fraud Report, released today, mortgage fraud suspicious activity reports referred to law enforcement increased 5 percent to 67,190 during fiscal year 2009.

It’s estimated that $14 billion in fraudulent loans originated in 2009. The total dollar loss attributed to mortgage fraud is unknown.

Other key findings presented in the report include:

There are more than 2.8 million properties with foreclosure filings, a 120 percent increase from 2007 to 2009. The Las Vegas area reported the most significant rate of foreclosures, with more than 12 percent of housing units there receiving a foreclosure notice.

The top 10 states ranked by the number of foreclosure filings per housing unit were California, Florida, Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, Georgia, Ohio, Texas, and New Jersey. In April 2010, one in every 386 housing units received a foreclosure filing.

Prevalent mortgage fraud schemes in fiscal year 2009 include loan origination, foreclosure rescue, builder bailout, equity skimming, short sale, illegal property flipping, reverse mortgage fraud and loan modifications. Emerging trends include fraud involving economic stimulus plans/programs, property theft/fraudulent leasing of foreclosed properties and tax-related fraud.

Next Page »